It's my view that once in a while there is also room for opinion and speculation by informed anons within the notables. Sometimes an anon makes an outstanding post that consists solely of their own thoughts, the result of cogitating upon the crumbs or current events. I don't see a reason to exclude such posts on principle. I would insist that if an Op-Ed post is made notable, it must be of high quality and generally highly acclaimed.
This allows anons on other shifts to have the benefit of other anons' thinking, without the now-impossible task of reading every single bread made during their sleep period.
What say you, anons?