>>3950295 PB on How the Vote was done before machines; Stings for Illustration of Fraud?

https://www.axios.com/2018-midterms-california-gil-cisneros-young-kim-1542508058-d32b1cf0-8ee8-411d-92d9-209346c2022b.html

>CA fires fake distraction from AZ, GA & FL, which are distractions from the REAL election thefts all across the country.

>DEEP DEEP RED areas for all fed, state and local levels suddenly flipping totally blue everwhere… despite the policies and boons they've been begging for decades?

>Again: all across the country.

Hopefully a sting setup this time, in each of those areas. Would be useful in 2 ways I can think of so far. You have to collect evidence of a crime. No way to prosecute a crime that has not happened yet, so, how do we use this criminal "midterm" activity to our advantage? Sting for evidence.

1) Would make for evidence that would be used to prosecute certain Dems in office through criminal acts unless; the thieving Democrats elected behave and vote MAGA.

2) Those who refuse to MAGA, would be the ones under more severe threat/control by cabal or bigger pay to play rewards get singled out. Races stolen become evidence of need investigate their connections, and best…. to change election laws by exposing the evidence of massive fraud to the public.

If sting = win win win

If not, we the people have to get serious and set up a district by district takeover of election boards, nation wide. This would require door to door work to get elected to the many boards of election who decided to create a vote-by-machine system.

Remove the machines.

We never needed them when each polling place was required to have only 500 people per poll, and hand counting was like counting 10 decks of cards.

All parties and news paper reporters watched the count.

All signed off on the count.

Count was placed in a window at the polling place so newspaper could come by, photograph, and put in the "official count by poll" for the whole state pages that were always printed in local papers, next day. I know. I use to look at these pages with all of the numbers in columns of the next day newspapers. So did many oldfags.

Newspaper numbers were compared to state capital totals, by THE PUBLIC who decided to compare them and look for corruption, just like anons look for corruption today.

Fuckery was not easy.

Eyes of the public everywhere.

Machines creating the largest problem.

Whatever we devise, we need to re-gain public inspection of EVERY step of the voting process.