>>3950985 (lb)
>breadfan
You sir/madam, are og punk..
Yeah, we know you're either CIA or Mossad, no need to tell us for the millionth time, dickhead.
> Since when do we put opinions and speculations in notables
This happens a LOT.
ask any ebaker that's had to put shit back together after the shills fuck it up, or when a real baker gets fucked by ddos and we have to pick up the pieces in a fast moving bread.
It happens.
Then shit gets clean up and we move on, just ike every other fucking timeโฆ. FFS.
>PS are you a robot?
yep. and unless you want me to associate you with this guy โ .>>3951065
You should just drop it. Because UIDs are what they are, in this place. And the operators use several, as you know.
Can't always judge a person by their music tastes.
> I believe when Q stated as such I do not think he meant Bots specifically. I believe he meant that this is not the 'normal daily grind' of shills we see on the reg. We are over target, and they know, and they are afraid
I don't think Q meant bots, perse, eitehr. I think they meant:
1) The regular shillshop shills aren't cutting it, and
2) for the "operations" (ie- bomberman, election fraud, CA, et al), [they] are calling in real memetic war operators for sorties, in a sense.
3) this is why the shilling has been in waves. [They] can't afford for the trained ops to be here 24/7. So [they] do it in concert with the live ops.
I try to look for sauce links that aren't obvious fake shit when I do bake.
I ignore calls for notables and trust myself when I bake, too.
Other bakers should also trust themselves more.
> Is it possible to create a graphic of the amount of posting IP's over a period of time on this board with out doxxing anyone.
No.
The shills actually tried doing this to the bakers by attempting to get board management to agree to posting baker ip hashes.
Any surfae area left open to shills will be attacked.
Thank God /BO/ chose not to do this.