>>395539
>Kim Jong Un's "sister"
At first I thought she was younger than Kim and possibly the future reformer that NK needs.
I was mistaken.
Thanks Mike Pence for clearing that up for me.
>>395539
>Kim Jong Un's "sister"
At first I thought she was younger than Kim and possibly the future reformer that NK needs.
I was mistaken.
Thanks Mike Pence for clearing that up for me.
Are you sorting by topics discussed and their connections to each other?
I tried to archive securedrop and apache.be and a few minutes later archive.is stopped working for me..
can someone confirm for me?
https:// archive.is
I successfully archived the directory of the securedrop page and after that archive.is failed to load. Clearly something is up.
>mkultra.pdf
>>''It should be made clear from the outset that in general, we are
focusing on events that happened over 12 or as long as 25 years ago.''
>>''It should be emphasized that the programs that are of greatest concern
have stopped and that we are reviewing these past events in
order to better understand what statutes and other guidelines might be
necessary to prevent the recurrence of such abuses in the future. ''
>>''The reappearance of reports of the abuses of the drug testing program.
and reports of other previously unknown drug programs and
projects for behavioral control underline the necessity for effective
oversight''
These are some of the scariest lines. It took almost 12-25 years for the CIA to be investigated. This only happened because the reappearance of reports. In other words concerned anons began putting two and two together and started calling the government out on this.
By the way, go back 12 years from 1977 and tell me where it lands on?
yeaโฆ 1965โฆ Who was in office during that time? Who was supposed to be in office during that time? Did the concerning aspects of the projects really stop? Or did (they) put a stop to the one who was actually going to de-fund and terminate their projects?
> discussion about cell phone technology being used for controlling people,
Now connecting that to what Q said:
>Target subjects are pre disposable to certain mental illnesses.
>Target subjects are scouted over a period of time to study and arrange 'THERAPY
If you needed a whole cattle of mentally ill people, where would you go?
Who can't get work? Depressed for not finding jobs, illness, etc?
What would you give them to trigger that illness?
>what are the odds the Obamaphone give-a-way was just a welfare program
>and not something more sinister?
Kanye had a mental breakdown.
As did Eminem.
Kanye has been pretty quiet as far as I know
But Eminem went on an all out verbal warfare against Trump and his 'kind'.
So I can't say the meltdown is always a good thing.
OR maybe Eminem chose to be reprogrammed because the alternative option made him sick to his stomach (Conservatism, Christianity, Sobriety, etc.)