Anonymous ID: d8e77d Feb. 16, 2018, 6:17 a.m. No.396203   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>396187

Tides, river patterns/obstructions/freezes/etc.

The Bay of Fundy is a prime example. Pic related is a daily occurrence. It's got the highest tide in the world.

Anonymous ID: d8e77d Feb. 16, 2018, 6:28 a.m. No.396262   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>396101

I'm guessing somebody is spoofing the spokesperson. Similar to when the guy who denied Peter Sutton's claims about Obama's harvard scholarship was not at all related to the Sutton family

Anonymous ID: d8e77d Feb. 16, 2018, 6:32 a.m. No.396292   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6337

>>396235

I've noticed it. It makes no sense when they could much more easily use real images, so it's obviously intentional. Perhaps it's something as simple as using CGI to trigger viewer's attention to the image's position in the 'uncanny valley.' Essentially, a viewer isn't really paying attention, but then goes "wait - that's not a real person" and then turns their attention to the presentation. Doesn't even have to be vocalized, could be subconscious. In a conspiratorial context I might guess it has something to do with desensitization to artificiality but really I don't see any leads on a clear answer.

Anonymous ID: d8e77d Feb. 16, 2018, 6:38 a.m. No.396325   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6359 >>6370

>>396297

And Stranger Things focuses on MK Ultra. Mr. Robot on a plausible Illuminati-style conspiracy.

 

With what we've learned about Hollywood's evil and its deep ties to CIA, as well as its penchant for hiding messages in its content (like 30 Rock Harvey Weinstein joke or Family Guy Kevin Spacey joke), I think that these and other conspiracy-type themes are, as we're finding, indicative of the truth.

It's a form of predictive programming, you might say, or simply a form of threatening enemies. Or whatever else. But I think this is why Q is constantly referring us to movies.

Anonymous ID: d8e77d Feb. 16, 2018, 6:42 a.m. No.396351   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>396330

No, they've got it already. What is happening now is narrative establishment. It wouldn't be palatable if we singled out CF for investigation without similar cases in the aid industry. Normies are presently digesting the notion that aid groups could molest and traffic children (and that's a big thing to digest) - and then CF will hit once precedent is entrenched, and investigation will occur all as if things are unknown, and after a time the hammer will fall in full. It's what Q has been advising, and what strategists have known for centuries.