>>396584

Shared thread, not just mine. We are hive mind.

>>397006

I think that is a very good idea. Something you could read forward or backwards.

>>397026

I'm not sure I follow. Can you elaborate?

>>397625

Everyone is different, anon. Therefore you are going to see many perspectives from many people. Another thing to keep in mind is that some maps our new and evolving, while others our completed segments bigger picture. Some anons may choose to post descriptors, while others may just choose to post the graphic. This is an image board and this is simply a thread for mapfags to collaborate and share.

>>400864

Interesting that you are missing the Rothschild ownership of the Rio Tinto Group in the map. A lot of ties you have there, good work. You should add the Roths' historical ownership in Rio Tinto.

OP here. I'll have some more work to post on Sunday I have real life stuff to do this weekend. I hope to see some more great maps when I get back.

>>409368

>>409996

>>408786

OP here. I think all of you anons have some great insight and some amazing ideas. >>409811 said it best about having reservations collaborating especially off-platform. If need be, anons can build separate node build-outs right here. Perhaps for those interested proinfofag anon can post his work or even just a basic non-detailed big-picture view and other SMExpertfags can claim their node from that or portion thereof and build it. If we're looking for many smaller maps to build the main one, we can collaborate and also work separately right here, and everyone can use the software of their choosing, plus archive everything offline - redundant offline archiving.. Just my humble 2 cents on that. Once we have something substantial, we can post the resulting map where others may freely see it or use it.

>>413206

I'm using iThoughtsX for Mac. It is $50 and very functional.