Anonymous ID: a0d07d Nov. 19, 2018, 11:10 a.m. No.3962119   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2180

>>3961988

Q has posted numerous hints. Disinfo is necessary, however there have been sprinkles of truth throughout Q’s posts to let anons know where Bob stands…

 

1) muller’s team 20-25? No. Think 470 (the size of Huber’s team). No coincidences.

2) Fishing- you need bait, a Rod and Bob(bers).

3) if potus didn’t approve of RR/mueller, do you think they would still be there?

 

As you can see, Q’s sporadic references add up, showing where they stand.

Anonymous ID: a0d07d Nov. 19, 2018, 11:18 a.m. No.3962209   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2277

>>3962180

I’ve neber seen the word “interview” in anything from Q. That’s where I stake my research. The rest doesn’t matter- anons speculate but that’s just anons. Not Q. So I just bypass that fluff.

Anonymous ID: a0d07d Nov. 19, 2018, 11:29 a.m. No.3962340   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2360

>>3962277

The word interview is a Q&A session. Q never said JOB interview.

That’s where the speculation arises. Q said Mueller was interviewed prior to appointment.

THAT is the difference.

Anonymous ID: a0d07d Nov. 19, 2018, 11:38 a.m. No.3962422   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>3962392

It was a military appointment. He was interviewed prior to being appointed- not a job interview- an assignment. Remember, this is a military op, not a civil job assignment. Tribunals- evidence of TREASON are the key to this investigation.

There is a difference.