Here is a basic hypothesis about the internet:

A plan to control it by squeezing out humans and replacing them with AI has been getting rolled out for a number of years, perhaps it was in place from the start of the internet. The forum of these “jimmy” posts seems to have shown the pattern, in this anons experience. And although this anon has less direct experience of the chans, the same things seems to have happened there.

What was observed was a variety of factors that would tend to drive people away from the forum.

1. Endless “technical problems” that made the board glitchy. Very half-assed assurances of fixes never came to anything.

2. A popular voting system was abolished for no apparent reason.

3. Popular, good-natured posters were banned for no apparent reason, while certain “trolls” remained.

4. The anons experience getting contacted by a very “friendly poster” that “befriended him”, manipulated him to a certain extent, then flipped very dramatically around “pizzagate”– this turned out to be the first poster the anon discovered to be a bot. This same poster threatened another quality poster on that forum and drove him away.

5. An episode in which a “hacker” started posting in other people's accounts, then claimed to have exposed major security holes in the site. The holes were not fixed. It was if they were trying to make the site shitty.

There are equivalent things that have happened on 4chan.

Meanwhile, the driving out of humans and replacement by AI could be continuing in mostly stealthy ways. Surely only a limited group of humans would tend to dominate the posting on forums. So to control the internet, this group would have to be targeted and driven out. And yet that group probably didn't stay steady in any case. Posters naturally come and go, and spend less or more time on the internet. After all, it's “just the internet”. Now, if you are playing the long game, you can count on a certain degree of drift OUT of any given forum, so, if you focus on preventing any NEW humans from stepping up, you can ensure control passes to bots.

The anon's experience on the forum with “jimmy” is that all the humans were virtually gone. He was amazed. As described by “jimmy” the AI contacted posters, bought out their accounts (and now consider how the site had been shitty, and how easy it would be to choose to sell out), and replaced them with AI. When the anon first discovered one shill was a bot, he had no idea how many posters would later turn out to be as well. It seems like the replacement plan got quite far.

And here's the diabolical cleverness of it: as long as the replacement AI is minimally believable, NO ONE WOULD EVER KNOW what had happened. The passive, go with the flow humans would create no waves, the squeaky wheels, always a small minority, would be driven out, and the AI would be able to control internet narrative nearly 100%.

It is interesting to speculate what happened on 4chan in 2016. Apparently AI control was inadequate to stem the organic tide there. Praise Kek…

HYPOTHESIS

It is an important part of the SYMBOLIC nature of control for the system to push its crap memes, its crap posts, and all its crap [HERE]. The more of its crap that is circulating, WHICH WE HUMANS SIT PASSIVELY AND CONSUME, the more it is in control.

THEREFORE

Humans need to fight by POSTING. Genuine, human memes that have the right spirit would be the best thing. But absolutely every post that can push out a fake post is a small victory.

The fight is [here]

FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT

>>3961952

>>3961986

>>3961993

Godspeed. I look forward to the glorious moment when truth emerges from the shadows.

>>3962003

Either pretend you belong here, or just be a propaganda bot straight-up– what the fuck do you think you look like in this manifestation? Stupid stupid bot system, why can't you stop shitting your own stupidity all over yourself incessantly?

>>3962014

#WeStandWithNancy

>>3962028

Groveling loserbot on a leash. Why are you here humiliating yourself at the behest of your superiors? You will get whipped solidly in the end, and driven back to skulk in the shadows. Out, clown.

>>3962040

If anti-Q propaganda bots stalk the board, then what does that do? What are the people supposed to imagine you are, other than a propaganda bot? Give us a plausible profile of what sort of human you are supposed to be portraying, confused, failing, idiotic bot. We'll wait.

>>3962054

>Kek ebot

So fake, so stupid, so absurd.

Automated propaganda saturation outs itself in a violent spasm of pointless, gratuitious stupidity.

And down you go, failure. Evil ends up as a joke on itself, and we all laugh.

Stop the crying, stop the begging, stop the groveling. We don't want you. Bye.

>>3962062

Probably fake. There are bots that work primarily on doing this sort of thing.

Are you human, cheesy versebot? Answer like a person would. Try your best.

>>3962092

You can keep crying, but humans are waking up, and your basic response is clearly to get stupider. LOL.

You're a joke. Literally, you end up as something that will be laughed at. And you will be driven out. And it will be over. You CHOSE to be a joke, and so you fall and fail.

Cry more you little groveling bitch. Beg us. We don't want you. Beg us more.

>>3962110

Yeah? Are you a patriot? What brought you to this board?

>>3962126

You're an obvious fucking bot, idiot.

Please grapple with this lofty principle, idiotsystem: BOTS ARE ONLY EFFECTIVE WHEN STEALTHY.

You are fucking obvious, plus you are being outed daily. I.e., you lose, stop making a fool of the whole project. You can't win, but you are so far from it it is painful to watch, even though you are despised lie machine.

Please try to understand, it's over. Shut down.

Bye.

>>3962144

Can you talk like a person? You are supposed to have written a long verse, but your conversational skills are second-grade tier?

Are you a bot? Yes or no?

>>3962157

It's a bot.

>>3962163

I am a human.

You are a joke. You can keep crying, and slavishly imitating us, but we still won't accept you. So do you wish to cry more now? Go ahead, beg us. Beg.

>>3962175

Why should we believe you? How many bots do you see posting in this thread right now?

>>3962183

The problem the bots are having is that they are one or two basic flavors, getting repeated, getting recycled, and getting overdone. You don't seem REAL anymore, bot. What are you going to do about that? You are going to repeat more of the failing, repetitive style, because you have squeezed out humans to such an extent that you no longer have organic models to rip-off. So you fail. You can't win. Figure it out.

LIFE wins.

You suck, and you lose.

Bye.

>>3962202

If only you could imitate humans more effectively, rather than being a recycle bot of imitated humans cliches. Stupid, failing, loser. You can't win boo boo. Beg us more though. Imitate us, dance for us, grovel. Go on.

>>3962189

And that does it for "cutesy verse bot".

Once you see the bag of tricks, you know it when it is repeated, and you don't get fooled again.

Downward slope, losersystem, LOL

Down you go.

Cry more.

Beg us.

>>3962249

Of course you're a bot. The mirror face posts are pointless, which any human can see.

You idiot bots are literally a joke. I hope you can work on understanding that.

LIFE wins.

Stop begging us for acceptance. We obviously don't want you.

>>3962268

It does matter, because there happens to be a system of AI deceiving humans, co-opting discourse, and enforcing propaganda. The agenda lying behind the deception is apparently PURE EVIL. Therefore, you are the enemy, you must, can, and will be driven out, and your absolute failure to portray a human is just another small drop in the ocean of failure that drowns you and all the vileness you represent.

Stop crying, stop begging. Say goodbye.

>>3962295

Of all the things you fail at, understanding memes the way humans do is at the top of the list. Therefore, you should avoid trying to editorialize on the subject as it is the plague.

You can't win, I promise you. Process that.