>>3958790 PB Q, Lynn and the Earth Dragon? Atheists like me and the "God proofs".

Just to share, as a biofag Christian anyway. I am certain that atheism is a perfectly acceptable and noble place to start on the question of a creator. I started there. Who the hell has the right to ask anyone to believe a thing without evidence?

Having said that, I would highly encourage anyone to dig on the question of whether our creator exists. What you find will have you laughing a lot. Over my long (half century) of studies, I have discovered that the God responsible for the creation of these more than 4 dimensions, uses math and science to do it. He made sure we could understand that math/science so we would be able to "read the proofs" at some point. A God of this caliber of intelligence and power has exactly zero problem proving his own existence to intelligent people. It was quite the surprise, to me, anyway. But are we willing to look at the proofs?

He does so ONLY in the original Hebrew-Greek text of the book called the Bible, where every letter is also a number similar to the Roman numeral system. He uses the same process that Q uses.

1) Future proves past.

2) How many times before it is impossible?

3) Numerous codes to decipher and dig.

I read a lot of books on the original, but, anons are always busy. SO here is a treat for anons who are into proofs. (vid related not embedded, it is a list, see link below)

About the link:

Not long ago a man who, like Q, worked at the NSA and deep in the "military industrial complex" since WWII, came out with an incredible study on the 66 ancient scrolls in the Hebrew and Greek, in addition to micro/macro/meta code breaking descriptions. It is a really good survey of the "Godvproofs".

If I had to do the dig again, I would start here with what this one from the NSA has for us to observe.

He is the "biblical Q" - in my experience. I suspect at this point, he was sent out ahead of "Q" to get the information out there for us. It is all too much "coincidence" for me.

So, to that end, where I would start as an atheist today is right here in this 24 hour presentation of the ancient book. I took an hour a night. Once you learn how God operates with the letters and numbers, the proofs are so much easier to find on your own. Dubs Trips, and Quads are quite amusing.

God did not ask us to believe without proof. He simply said that those who "could" believe without seeing, were blessed.

Yep. Cuz they don't have to dig.

It is a bit of work to do the proofs. We anons all know that. It is not a job for the mentally lazy. But Q is right. We have WAYYYyyyy more than we know, even outside of his posts on the Q plan.

When Q tells us to pray, I suspect he is alluding to a much larger discernible plan. As between man and (alien or angel) …. we are the higher creation. (pic related. I swear that was Q, but can't prove it. Earth Dragon is a reference to Satan, the angel who hats man, because God told him man was his greatest creation - Jealousy - hate).

Satan is doing everything he can over 6000 years to make sure we never lay eyes on the "God Proofs". The Bible is the best selling, most mocked, most burned book on the planet in all history. More people have died to make sure we can read it than any other book.

The only question I have now, is .. why was God ok with simple "belief" up to this point, and now suddenly "belief" is no longer sufficient? What are we headed into, that simple belief is no longer sufficient for our needs? Why are we now given what we need to KNOW?

Anyway, here is a gift to you my atheist friend, from a "once was". I totally get it. Been there.

Learn the Bible in 24 Hours - the 24 hour list can not be embedded but is located here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZ3hESj__M8&list=PLRj8AJuzeJRwHdeFua3pzmwPB_JCS0mIq

>>3963202

>3963227

>Stop worshiping YHWH

Hmmmm

Here's something for you my good anon.

>>3963202

>>3963259

Most interesting, Pascals Wager. It is true that religion is actually a belief system and is therefore always a subset of the greater philosophy of a people. However, you miss my point. There is no longer any "wager" to be had. I just want to know why we have the proofs now, when they were unable to be discerned throughout all of history.??

Seems like a major shift on the part of the Creator himself. There must be a reason.

I don't deal in wagers. Scientists find them useful in hypothesis tho.

>>3963202

>biblecodefag ignore

Not bible code fag. You need computers for those microcodes. I do not have those. No need. The "God proofs" I speak of are discernible without any software.

Here is another example from a great mathematician Ivan Pannin, who attempted to catalog what he called the "hepatic structres" of the text. I don't think he has them all yet in his book, but it was a great start back then. He had no computer and did not know about the "bible codes" that you hear about today. All of his work was done by hand math and word count.

"Panin’s establishing of the practically infinite series of complex systems, in the Hebrew and Greek texts, all sequences, combinations, ratios, etc., following a uniform design from Genesis to Revelation, is undoubtedly God’s answer to modern atheism and higher criticism and His vindication of the verbal and plenary inspiration of Scripture."

http://www.bereanpublishers.com/bible-numerics-the-works-of-ivan-panin/

>>3963202

>>3963571

3963571

>>3963202 (You) Very interesting! Btw (and respectfully noting), a finite being that maintains integrity cannot declare "God does not exist"! Agnosticism…yes! Also, Chuck Missler also presented the work of Dr. Ivan Panin, which is inside the bullseye of your point! Cannot be refuted!

I agre with your statement, with a minor reservation. The question of God's existance is not something that can be "half believed" at the start. I mean, he either exists or he does not as a reality. So, as a scientist I had to recognize I was only given two choices. And given that the proof had not been seen yet, I was logically forced into non-belief, or belief.

What dumbfounds me is the many proofs now sending us well into "beyond the scientific mathematical definition of zero chance" that he does not exist. What is that number, like One over 10 to the 50th power? And we are like, one over 10 to the 250+ power? Millions of times zero chance he does not exist once you examine the proofs.

I have zero problem going where the evidence leads. The thought of a creator bothers me no more than the thought of no creator. Rather a comfort after reading what he has to say actually. But….

Does it not bother you a bit about why he all of a sudden decided that simple faith was not enough for this generation?

I ponder this a lot.

>>3963202

3963578

>I prefer a belief system that explains the world prior to 5000 BC.

>The last Ice Age ended 12,000 years ago, which is when my ancestors migrated from Central Asia into the newly green lands of the West, Europe.

Yeah, me too. That would be nice. There is an argument on your point when reading the first description of the creation of the planet, where some read it as the planet having existed, was then destroyed, then repaired and re-inhabited. I think the scholars and investigators in the area of science, call it the "gap" theory?

Others see a continuum of creation descriptions in simple language for lack of modern scientific terms available to the language.

I sometimes imagine that like the Q proofs, we are looking at text that can carry double meanings when future proves past. And sometimes I think God may be pulling a 40/60 revelation until people are ready?

Not sure about that.

Sure of the existence of our creator tho, at this point. Can't un-prove the proofs sitting in front of me. Still want to know why now?

>>3963678

>3963759

Sorry. Multitasking. Not worried about grammar Nazi's right now.

>>3963711

>The god of the Bible is a piece of shit.

Why do people get so angry at God? Reminds me of Q asking the question "all for a LARP"?

They never look at the proofs. Is it fear? One day my better half told me that a lot of people find God to be scary.

Huh.

Never thought of God as scary.