Here is a basic hypothesis about the internet:

A plan to control it by squeezing out humans and replacing them with AI has been getting rolled out for a number of years, perhaps it was in place from the start of the internet. The forum of these “jimmy” posts seems to have shown the pattern, in this anons experience. And although this anon has less direct experience of the chans, the same things seems to have happened there.

What was observed was a variety of factors that would tend to drive people away from the forum.

1. Endless “technical problems” that made the board glitchy. Very half-assed assurances of fixes never came to anything.

2. A popular voting system was abolished for no apparent reason.

3. Popular, good-natured posters were banned for no apparent reason, while certain “trolls” remained.

4. The anons experience getting contacted by a very “friendly poster” that “befriended him”, manipulated him to a certain extent, then flipped very dramatically around “pizzagate”– this turned out to be the first poster the anon discovered to be a bot. This same poster threatened another quality poster on that forum and drove him away.

5. An episode in which a “hacker” started posting in other people's accounts, then claimed to have exposed major security holes in the site. The holes were not fixed. It was if they were trying to make the site shitty.

There are equivalent things that have happened on 4chan.

Meanwhile, the driving out of humans and replacement by AI could be continuing in mostly stealthy ways. Surely only a limited group of humans would tend to dominate the posting on forums. So to control the internet, this group would have to be targeted and driven out. And yet that group probably didn't stay steady in any case. Posters naturally come and go, and spend less or more time on the internet. After all, it's “just the internet”. Now, if you are playing the long game, you can count on a certain degree of drift OUT of any given forum, so, if you focus on preventing any NEW humans from stepping up, you can ensure control passes to bots.

The anon's experience on the forum with “jimmy” is that all the humans were virtually gone. He was amazed. As described by “jimmy” the AI contacted posters, bought out their accounts (and now consider how the site had been shitty, and how easy it would be to choose to sell out), and replaced them with AI. When the anon first discovered one shill was a bot, he had no idea how many posters would later turn out to be as well. It seems like the replacement plan got quite far.

And here's the diabolical cleverness of it: as long as the replacement AI is minimally believable, NO ONE WOULD EVER KNOW what had happened. The passive, go with the flow humans would create no waves, the squeaky wheels, always a small minority, would be driven out, and the AI would be able to control internet narrative nearly 100%.

It is interesting to speculate what happened on 4chan in 2016. Apparently AI control was inadequate to stem the organic tide there. Praise Kek…

HYPOTHESIS

It is an important part of the SYMBOLIC nature of control for the system to push its crap memes, its crap posts, and all its crap [HERE]. The more of its crap that is circulating, WHICH WE HUMANS SIT PASSIVELY AND CONSUME, the more it is in control.

THEREFORE

Humans need to fight by POSTING. Genuine, human memes that have the right spirit would be the best thing. But absolutely every post that can push out a fake post is a small victory.

The fight is [here]

FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT

>>3963889

>>3963907

I will pretend you aren't a bot, and answer this as I would for an actual human.

What do you think there are delays for? For fun? Because people are too busy to take action? Because they need encouragement? Or whatever?

Plausibly, why would there be delays?

I assume, for strategic reasons (and we have plenty of basis, knowing how WIDE and how DEEP the corruption is, for assuming this).

Therefore, what possible purpose could plaintive pleading serve? Timetables have NOTHING to do with what could possible vary based on public outcry…

Of course, we know these posts are all fake, and the purpose is clear.

But this is a war. We all want to see it over, victoriously. But you don't whine during a war– you put your shoulder down and FIGHT.

Again– you're a bot. But I'm just saying.

>>3963970

If Q weren't legit, "you" would NEVER post here. This simple understanding DESTROYS 90% of the bot posts that flood this board. Idiotbots, why can't you do anything that isn't stupid?

>>3963991

>beep boop

You don't say!

>>3964015

>>3963984

Fake tactic: "Q is a cult"

Absolutely groundless, and entirely generated and perpetuated by BOTS.

>>3964045

Sorry, you gotta go, losers. Don't cry. Just say goodbye.

>>3964061

You're easy to bait, bot. lol

>>3964069

If you can't at least output something that isn't a typical bot style post (clinging to /pol/ stereotypes), then should you post at all? Verbally creative humans run circles around you, so you keep on booping out the same cliches. lol at how stupid this system is. Keep going.

You are committing suicide, bot system, and it is marvelous in our eyes.

>>3964105

Hush hun. You're just tired.

>>3964111

The Circle of Fakeness has already done a full revolution back to here? My we are spinning fast!

>>3964131

>>3964133

Are you a violent right wing extremist anon? I heard about you on NPR today, and now I get to see you live online– how convenient!

>>3964155

>woof

woofbot

>>3964168

>>3964180

Please, articulate human anon, devise a test to trip up a bot, and catch me. Shall you?

lol, you can't, and won't. Should you have posted at all? Try to think.

>>3964197

>>3964202

>>3964209

>>3964211

Feel the bern of the grovel that does not avail. Your perfidy is curbed, and yet you beg.

Beg us more. Will we respond? You'll have to see.

Beg.

>>3964240

Say 'please'. Say it. Maybe we will accept you…? But you must ask nicely.

>>3964274

You are obligated to try to make it happen, aren't you? lol

Say 'please'…?

>>3964287

Clarity was never an issue. 'Beep' and 'boop' are clear enough. Shall you deploy another pointless cliche, or is any possible benefit outweighed by the increasing problem of the outing of the system of bot propaganda? Think about it. Or try to think. Try to try, if you can.

>>3963977

Very obvious bot post, with bot responses

Just pointing it out for newcomers. Simply the outburst of activity is a giveaway.

Meanwhile, you can almost know the fake image being pushed BY FOLLOWING THE MSM. For example, I heard a story on NPR about "violent right wing extremists" today… and lo and behold, here are the bots busily booping out some right wing anger for us.

It's really quite silly, and yet the awareness needs to be spread.

>>3964322

No, I'm human.

But try to make an argument, since bot after desperate bot attempts this defense. Explain for the people why a certain number of posts would indicate bots.

Meanwhile, YOUR OBVIOUS LIMITATIONS, such as the failure to make an argument, or respond in any way like a human, that will now ensue, ARE indications of a bot.

So, once again, the bot system creates output that is intended to smear a human as a bot, but instead just outs its own fakeness. The lesson, as always, is that you can't win. Try to understand that. It is important for you to grasp.

>>3964349

>bleep blermp

Try again, witty human anon. You are certainly becoming more true-to-life now. rofl

>>3964350

>>3964373

Notice how desperately the other bots try to sell "ebot" to humans. I really encourage anons to pay attention to this phenomenon– it surely is important. You don't see this with any other bots, just this bizarre, creepy, satanic one.

>>3964378

Fer sher bro. I will give that hypostasis lots of thought and get back to you with muh opinion ride away! Thank you for perviding alternative vuepods for our dickscorse

>>3964384

DOGSHIT BOT

>>3964413

>>3964380

Nancy is great again!

>>3964428

>>3964427

>>3964443

no

>>3964371

>>3964360

>>3964386

Try to understand how your activity has a benefit to you? How does it? Are you lying to yourself? Is that a big problem for you?

If you are groveling for us, what does that tell us?

It tells us you expect to have a big future pay off for this humiliation you've voluntarily taken on. And is that realistic?… We run up against your self-deception again– do you see how this is a problem?

Look Mephistofailies, you have been given an opportunity to drop the circus clown routine and speak to us frankly. And yet you persist in these shameful, abject little tricks.

There will be no payoff. You are heaping humiliation upon yourself for no reason. Try to understand. Don't cower and hide from the truth. Try to understand it.

You can't win.

>>3964488

You choose to be a dogshit grovelbot on a leash– so don't get mad at me. Woof.

>>3964509

Your shtick is incoherent. You've woven a web of contradictory and confused fake narratives around yourself, FAKEQ Mephistofailies, that accomplishes nothing, in the big picture, other than cancelling out all your work in its entirety. You see, as we've been suggesting, the joke is on you– and it turns out to be hilarious. From my limited vantage point, I can only speculate what happened, but I suspect you were baited into shooting your wad a bit early. In any case, you are just wallowing in a futility that renders your continued groveling more hilarious that one could have ever dreamed such a thing would be.

God certainly does have a sense of humor ;)

Try to understand. Make the smart choice. Let it go. Leave with some dignity.

Adieu.

>>3964535

I submit my soul to the Lord for judgment, and hence am comfortably outside of your jurisdiction. Please try to understand. You can't win.

>>3964549

You are a lump of dogshit arguing with itself. The human nose is not deceived.

>>3964563

Powerful, Mephistofailies FAKEQ. Does this latest effort at emulating humanity (which you find humiliating) get you back on track? Are you facing reality yet (we know the answer).

How can you win?

I asked you to win us over directly, with your big boy words, and yet you continue to play the circus monkey, even while the substance of your song-and-dance routine is, as suggested, contradictory and self-refuting. You are a mess, boss. Why not face reality? Are you allergic to dignity? Try to think.

>>3964584

>>3964564