>>3963642 (lb)
>>3963653 (lb)
>>3963670 (lb)
>kek
>why
>;)
>99c53d
Q never confirmed the clock. Reason being that either:
1) the clockfags do not yet have the confirmed solution to winding the clock
2) confirming it now would "waste an exploit" against [them]
Q has confirmed delta[0] though. So there's that.
>I'm here for the information and digs that come from Q's crumbs
same here, woo.
>not to promote some stupid shit I made up in May and continue to rationalize how its legitimate, while denouncing people that have questions or problems with its methodology, usage, and purpose
>I'm done with it, and think its fucking irrelevant
>they still can't, and won't, answer basic questions
I've observed the back and forth with it… It's just conjecture to me until a confirm happens.
>it should still be in notables however, because some anons still do whatever
I don't have an opinion on that, other than wishing more bakers stuck to properly sauced shit :)
…But it's been that way since the exodus from /pol/, so fuck it ;)
>Waste an exploit?
Yeah. Just like the script kiddies don't do when they best the top programmers at Apple.
>Anon, do you really believe that shadow govts and the families who have run the world for thousands of years, who have trillions of dollars, assets everywhere, and keep the brightest minds, including military intelligence, including military intelligence type software and hardware …
>you think those people haven't "decoded" Q's drops far better than we ever could, considering all of their assets and their inside knowledge?
Apparently not, because ~~you~~ 'scuse me, [they]… are losing?
>Isn't this one of this board's primary mistakes?
Not that I see. What I see is operators attempting to force consensus, and anons fighting back against it.
FWIW, fq is interested in the clock. That's a volume by itself.
Not saying it pushes me either way. Just noting the way it attracts who it attracts.