>>3963973

go back to gab microdick

>>3963984

>Made by "Boomers Against Q"

>>3963993

no not really

but don't question the clock, ever

>>3964001

based

>>3964019

>>3964055

for example, use the seconds instead of minutes in the latest "proof" in notables, and its irrelevant

clockfags say "idk, just use one or the other"

its not even a clock ffs

>>3964046

>yea totally

kek

I repent for questioning the clock

I will give myself the number of lashes required by the highest ranking clockfag

>>3964094

see: >>3964088

please let me know before the night shift starts

>>3964154

its not a clock

>>3964153

sauce (post the clock)?

>>3964187

<[:44] = 44 crewmen

yea totally

let me know when you clockfags decide on secs/mins

>>3964214

>Repeat until bedtime

implying your bedtime is before the night shift

>>3964255

There is no difference between pic1 and pic2

and that stupid pic you posted starts at 12/7 and ends at 12/1, is 360 days, and has 6 minutes

besides it being well formatted, its fucking stupid

>>3964363

that's a continued dig from last night right?

>>3964367

>>3964316

hey, watch it frens

you're questioning of the clock is as bad as orange man

>>3964385

>you're

meant your

>>3964255

>let me know when you clockfags decide on secs/mins

still waiting, after months now

"empty words" = methodology to clockfags apparently, and if you question it, you're a shill or a newfag

which is why many anons think, and have thought, its an utter bullshit slide

I shall repent

>>3964440

is that supposed to have any meaning?

>>3964432

I'm here for the information and digs that come from Q's crumbs

not to promote some stupid shit I made up in May and continue to rationalize how its legitimate, while denouncing people that have questions or problems with its methodology, usage, and purpose

I'm done with it, and think its fucking irrelevant

they still can't, and won't, answer basic questions

it should still be in notables however, because some anons still do whatever

>>3964484

>>3964466

>>3964443

go here:

>>>/rresearch/

1. because you're fucking brainlets

2. because that disinfo is actually there

>>3964512

>can't answer a simple question

I'll take that as a no

<I circled three dates, 1 relates to a crumb, 1 relates to two crumbs, and 1 relates to some random post form this bread

>>3964524

go fuck yourself

>>3964556

>It's just conjecture to me until a confirm happens.

they pushed this "proof" that was based on a crumb# and supposedly confirmed the clock was legit and Q posts in order to fit the clock

anons were skeptical, and were derided as shills and newfags

then a week later, an anon noticed the qmap/qanon.pub sites were missing a crumb or two, and the whole "proof" was btfo'd

and it was supposed to be the highest ranking "clock" "proof"

half the "proofs" wouldn't be "proofs" if there wasn't a yuge amount of rationalization

and they all act like fucking faggots like this one: >>3964586

ask: "what does that mean"

and the response is NPC screeching

I don't care what other anons think, and am not trying to dissuade anons from clockfagging, just tired of the stupid shit and will call it out

>>3964586

>>3964606

forgot the pic, fuck off to your containment thread faggot

>>3964637

>typical clockfag

I hope you, and other clockfags, know you reconfirm anons' opinions daily

please keep it up