Can we move on to changing math and science now?
We can easily think and draw in 4 dimensions being a moving cube or a hyper sphere. Question would 5 D be the entire 4D timeline (the hyper-sphere full timeline, linear, or would it be inside the figure?
Personally I think it involves being able to think beyond 4 dimensions and actually see it graphically or in your minds eye.
It would be easy to make it move linearly. It would be beyond my ability to make each turn into the circle move and flow in and through and back out. But if any one has that talent the next step would be to be able to add rotation and probably that is what the electron orbit really is.
Probably - but POV in gaming is a very good way to learn to shift dimensional views.
That is actually a mathematical object - called a strange attractor. Actually the Lorentz Attractor made 3D. The weather guy that calculated a beat of a butterfly wing could create a hurricane across the globe.
Well the hopf hyper sphere is the best mathematical image of the electron orbit yes.
Any time you can look at a 2 D image and see 3 D you are seeing into a new dimension. Any time you can look at a 3 D and see it move in 4 D you are seeing a new dimension. Thus we have the inherent ability to see the next dimension - it is built into our nature.
Also known as Quantum Entanglement.
Where one object causes a distant object to change pattern in the same way the original object changes.
No strange attractors seem to be more like 'knots' of probability greatly increasing the probability of a low probability event.
That is freakin awesome thanks.
Note each shift in angle is basically a new dimension (real or fractal your choice).
No sorry I do not.
No I do not sorry.
Just the matching Julia Sets in the Mandelbrot.
And this picture is the closest I have found to making euclidean fractal Mandelbrot.
actually act the quark level it jumps and back between matter and energy all the time creating a swirling dance of energy and mass in the proton that is stable because it has one up and two down quarks (as I recall).
Euler number just looks like Fabbiconi spiral at a different POV in the fractal pattern to me.
Euler's number could be used to define a fractal system instead of the Mandelbrot set just by changing the limits allowed before the reach to infinity. It might make sense to use Euler's number in the limit of the set or a derivative of the Euler's number.
I just don't understand why that guy keeps posting about his pussy and calls it toots?