got to ask clockfags for conformation
your irrelevant bitching doesn't change the fact your stupid graphic is not clock
make a clock already faggot
you can't refute this:
pic1 and pic2 are used exactly the same, making the analog clock markings on your graphic erroneous and that stupid graphic not a clock
meant this for pic 2, but nonetheless
sorry anon, wasted digs on a graphic that has analog clock markings in the middle
Hi-fucking-IQ post
putting the analog clock there is irrelevant, having those "second/minute" markers there doesn't change that
those randomly place dates start at the :20 (second/mintue) marker, when the first crumb was :28/:44 (s/m respectively), so they're also irrelevant
>Ooops … I forgot that you're to retarded to notice that in your "rage against the QClock".
>How do they pay you per post? Do they let you touch little boys with impunity for your "efforts" here, or do they pay money?
I forgot, anyone that asks questions that ruin your delusional faggotry is a shill
I've noticed clockfags are some of the most insecure faggots here, nothing can be challenged or they bitch and whine
which is why I am TRYING to get answers from you faggots, but you continue to do nothing but act like inscure faggots that bitch and whine
make a clock or btfo
soon!
<everyone that challenges or questions muh clock is a shill
refute the claims or btfo
so, let me ask, does that even have meaning?
is there a crumb attached?
who cares when a pic was made and how does that relate to anything?
<everyone that challenges or questions muh clock is a shill
if a few logical challenges to your graphic makes you cry shill, its a forth while exercise to challenge it
anons refute shills about Q all the time, you clockfaggots still can't
I am aware that I am not the only anon who has these thoughts and discrepancies with the graphic, but I am doing this as an exercise
not many anons will, but I think its worthwhile
clockfag shit should still be in notables, they can still do whatever they think they're doing, but I will continue challenge them, like this faggot: >>3966918
can't refute a DAMN thing I said, just question if I'm a "real anon" and I'm "paid"
It became apparent to me they can't so I threw some bait out, and its confirming my observations
I mean really, read this: >>3966918
<thats one very secure anon right there
<why don't you want to work on this shit that was made up at the end of may?
stop pushing it like its gospel you insecure faggots
or respond with a logical argument thats not reddit-tiered faggotry
<you can't
I can refute every claim that discredits Q logically
"clock"fags just bitch and whine like a victim of 'shilling'
grow up, refute the claims, or fuck off and do something useful