All About TRAITOR Retired Admiral William Henry McRaven Seal Team 6 MURDERER!!!
3 reasons why the Osama bin Laden assassination story stinks
Posted on July 31, 2013 by Dr. Eowyn | 46 comments
Something really really stinks about that Navy SEALS raid (and assassination) on Osama bin Laden’s compound in Abottabad, Pakistan, on May 2, 2011.
Here are three big reasons why we can’t believe the story we’ve been told.
-
Obama regime’s story about the raid keeps changing:
(See “White House’s Osama Kill Story Keeps Changing,” May 5, 2011)
• Was bin Laden armed or not?
• Did he have a gun battle with the SEALS or not?
• Was one of bin Laden’s wives killed in the raid or not?
• Did Bin Laden use her as a human shield or not?
• Who made the final decision to kill Bin Laden: Obama or the SEALS?
• Was there a live video footage of the raid, or not? The most recent version from the White House was that there wasn’t. If there was no live feed, what were Obama and his White House team watching in this much-publicized Situation Room photo? (Not to mention the fact that graphic artist and author Mara Zebest had analyzed the image below and determined that it’s been “manipulated,” including the insertion of Obama into the image, which means he was never in that situation room!)
The White House captioned this “Situation Room of Osama bin Laden takedown”
-
The Pentagon said it had no records — not one photo, not one video, not even an e-mail — of bin Laden’s death:
(See “Pentagon has no records of Osama bin Laden’s death,” March 28, 2012.)
A year later, in March 2012, in response to repeated (more than 20!) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests by the Associated Press for files about the raid, which the AP had submitted the day after bin Laden’s supposed assassination, the Pentagon told the AP:
• It could not locate any photographs or video taken during the raid or showing bin Laden’s body.
• It could not find any images of bin Laden’s body on the Navy aircraft carrier where the al-Qaida leader’s body was taken.
• It could not find any death certificate, autopsy report or results of DNA identification tests for bin Laden, or any pre-raid materials discussing how the government planned to dispose of bin Laden’s body if he were killed.
• It said it had searched files at the Pentagon, U.S. Special Operations Command in Tampa, Fla., and the Navy command in San Diego that controls the USS Carl Vinson, the aircraft carrier used in the mission, but could not find any emails about the bin Laden mission or his “Geronimo” code name that were sent or received in the year before the raid by William McRaven, the three-star admiral at the Joint Special Operations Command who organized and oversaw the mission.
• The Pentagon said it also could not find any emails from other senior officers who would have been involved in the mission’s planning.
-
A year later, the Pentagon purged its computers of all files on the raid:
Given the Pentagon’s denial in March 2012 that it had NO, NOTHING, NADA, ZERO record of the bin Laden assassination, it is curious to say the least that on July 8, 2013, the AP reports that an order was given from a “top special operations commander” (Adm. William McRaven) to purge all military files about the Navy SEAL raid from Defense Department computers, and to send those files instead to the CIA, where they could be more easily shielded from ever being made public.
l to r: Admiral William McRaven; McRaven with POTUS
From the AP:
The secret move, described briefly in a draft report by the Pentagon’s inspector general, set off no alarms within the Obama administration even though it appears to have sidestepped federal rules and perhaps also the Freedom of Information Act.
An acknowledgement by Adm. William McRaven of his actions was quietly removed from the final version of an inspector general’s report published weeks ago. A spokesman for the admiral declined to comment.
https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2901239/pg1?c1=1&c2=1&disclaimer=Continue