>>3967770

It will make more sense once you recognize the "Middle Ages' / "Dark Ages" never happened.

the scribes / secretaries falsified histroy and projected it back in time to create the illusion of lengthy history and protect themselves from the recognition of their crimes.

Have no idea if this has to do with other /generally unknown races [?]]

The timeline was created artficially by "Julius Caesar SCALigari"

That's why the numbers might match a certain pattern? It will take a lot of work to un-wind it all..

If you learn Russian you have a better chance of studying it; since the best researchers in this field are Russian. A team. A. Fomenko mathematician and physicist.

>>3968016

Wow. I wonder when she will feel remorse; if ever? The problems with being convinced you are morally superior.

If this is even real. But it could be very well since I know a few like that.

>>3968243

wasn't called "jon jon" either.

>>3968140

"I was there - er" always show at fake events.

And always make me more suspicious.

Been there done that.

As Gowdy says, most people know shit on how to question witnesses.

"My fam knew someone who knew someone."

Yeah that works.

Not.

The people who do it might not be liars. but they construe evidence where there is none. Because muh, they lived down the street - so somehow they are personally involved with the legend. And have become a part of history as a result; so it becomes part of their ego.

It's actually not evidence.

Seen it too many times/ online.

>>3968243

>>3968346

Yes, it's an old story.

Believe what you are told, what is repeated on TV and don't believe your own eyes, nor mind

>>3968404

Yes, but you didn't question your informant, you just took the word of the person.

"I knew him from childhood" means nothing.