>>3968869

I wrote about Fox News in last bread re the caravan coverage, which was half-based, for sure. And on election night, they behaved very strangely, except for Laura Ingraham, who seemed angry but holding it together. I was wondering then whether they had been given some kind of instructions.

Then Fox completely threw Lou Dobbs under the bus, when he did nothing wrong except discuss Soros caravan financing. Fox, the idiots, rebroadcast the show on the day of the synagogue shootings, and then blamed Dobbs and his guest from JW for their "anti-Semitic" remarks because they criticized Soros.

>>3968869

Re >>3968921 "half-baked" not "half-based"

>>3968669

Does this Reporters Cmte for Freedom of the Press have anything to do with the Freedom of the Press Foundation??

>>3968669

Assange-related Questions Not Yet Answered

1. In Jan-Feb 2018, the people who were most closely associated with SecureDrop (formerly DeadDrop) die unexpectedly: James Dolan (suicide), Aaron Swartz (suicide), and John Perry Barlow (“heart problems”). Kevin Poulson turns over Securedrop to Freedom of the Press and goes on to work as Senior National Security reporter for The Daily Beast, focusing heavily on Russian election hacking

(https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/watch/mccaskill-id-d-as-first-2018-target-of-russian-hackers-report-1286527555949?v=railb&playlist=associated&cid=sm_npd_ms_tw_ma; this is a Rachel Maddow report; see Poulsen @ ~7:00).

1. What is the current relationship between Wikileaks & Freedom of the Press Foundation? In Dec 2017, FPF was slated to cut ties with Wikileaks:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/20/wikileaks-set-lose-support-freedom-press-found/

This appears to have happened. Who was in control of FPF’s Board at that time? Who is in control now?

https://cafe-babylon.net/2017/12/21/julian-assange-responds-to-the-freedom-of-the-press-foundation-cutting-wl-loose/

1. What's the current situation with SecureDrop (still a data collection tool of C_A)? It now appears to be used by a long list of MSM news organizations (Wikipedia).

1. When I search on SecureDrop on the Internet, it is still touted as a safe drop for whistleblowers. I wonder how safe it would seem if the public had read Q Posts 628 or 770. (628 tells us that everything dropped into SecureDrop–which is now used by all the MSM–goes straight to the CIA. 770 expands the picture, mentioning that all the original developers or others who "knew too much" are now dead, since Feb 2018, and asks questions about the current controllers of FPF—the Snowden group including Greenwald, Ellsburg and Poitras. Asking "Who controls Snowden?”, Q implies more than once that Snowden is now a marked man. Is it because—like Assange–he knows too much?

>>3969046

Well, yes, it would be nice to know if he's alive. But the other questions are still relevant even if he's not. I think he is, tho, but time will tell.

>>3969056

True. Sometimes I wonder if they periodically get together for dinner or strategy mtgs.

>>3969084

During the Christmas shopping season?

>>3969104

Not that I'm wanting to wait, it just crossed my mind a couple days ago. Would throw a grenade into the economy.

>>3969123

Good point. Time to come home, time for our country.

>>3969154

QRV is a tough forum, no way to track a conversation, as here. Totally confusing if there are more than 20 posts. And sometimes there are hundreds.

>>3969157

I trust the plan, but not all the info, because some is disinfo. My personal plan involves digging, supporting, critiquing, and listening. And praying that I'm in the right place at the right time to do whatever is necessary.

Ready for Christmas to be truly a return of what Christmas really stands for.

>>3969208

I'm wondering whether your facts are also made stronger by some kind of gut feeling. That's what makes me feel I can stand on something and know it to be true.