This makes sense to me.
I think the "Newsweek" idea really does make sense. Q probably can't give us an exact code to decipher because then (((they))) would know it to. But "future proves past," and looking at the 4 lines, with the knowledge of "Newsweek," I can see it. A computer could not. There's plausible deniability . . . and one more example of a place where autists can see the Q message but the MSM (think Newsweek article) can claim just another stupid failed prediction.