Anonymous ID: d558b4 Feb. 16, 2018, 8:47 a.m. No.397302   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7306 >>7312 >>7359

I haven't found the scientists yet but I've found something interesting. It looks like a company call Iridium owns a lot of the satellites.

 

They've been using SpaceX (hello Elon) to launch their new fleet of satellites:

>Iridium Communications is finally set for its initial launch of 10 next-generation satellites aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket Saturday, the first batch in a $3 billion 72-satellite network that will replace the companyโ€™s current fleet of aging low-Earth-orbit mobile voice and data relay stations.

 

The scientists might be related to this company in some way.

 

Is Iridium involved with the secret Zuma satellite that was "destroyed?"

 

https:// www.nextbigfuture.com/2018/01/iridium-ceo-believes-spacex-not-at-fault-for-loss-of-secret-zuma-satellite.html

Anonymous ID: d558b4 Feb. 16, 2018, 9 a.m. No.397409   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7433

>>397359

 

There it is. I bet these dead scientists are related to Iridium.

 

>>397347

 

Thanks for the suggestion. I'm aware of a lot of the HAARP/5g threat as I've been a TI for a while and have done extensive research. I'm trying to dig specifically on Q's drop of the three dead scientists.

Anonymous ID: d558b4 Feb. 16, 2018, 9:03 a.m. No.397437   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7665

>>397401

 

Oh no, they'll know who I am. If you know anything about trackers it doesn't matter if I use google or not. The fact I'm using chrome, cookies, have other programs open, etc. means they can track me regardless of what website I'm using.

 

If you want actual opsec you should use tails/tor with no hard drive. But then you stick out because you're using those technologies. It's best to just get lost in the noise.

Anonymous ID: d558b4 Feb. 16, 2018, 9:06 a.m. No.397474   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7492 >>7504 >>7611

The fact it's this difficult to find any news articles about the three dead satellite scientists tells me there is something extra juicy in there. Could they have been "researching" something else as cover for their real research?

Anonymous ID: d558b4 Feb. 16, 2018, 9:19 a.m. No.397615   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

http:// rense.com/general39/death.htm

>In March 1987, David Sands, a project manager working on secret satellite radar at Marconi's sister company Easams, in Camberley, drove up a slip road on his way to work and into a cafe at an estimated 80mph. A year later, Trevor Knight, a computer engineer at Marconi's space and defence base in Stanmore, died in his fume-filled car at his home in Hertfordshire. Earlier, two other Marconi employees, Victor Moore, a design engineer, and Roger Hill, a draughtsman, had killed themselves, both seemingly as a result of work pressures.

Anonymous ID: d558b4 Feb. 16, 2018, 9:40 a.m. No.397802   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Since Q dropped the dead satellite scientists I've realized a few things during my research.

 

  1. Being a brilliant scientist is a hazard to ones health.

 

  1. If you want to see what the evil cabal is developing to control/subjugate the "sheep" you simply have to track the dead scientists.

 

Dead homeopaths = natural cure/remedies for modern day afflictions.

 

Dead microbiologists = development of drug resistant bugs. Why is it we can't get a grasp on drug resistant bugs?

 

Dead AIDS researchers = found cure/found evidence of retrovirus engineering.

 

Dead cancer researcher = found cure/effective treatment. Maybe found evidence of engineering of cancer causing viruses.

 

Lots of dead semiconductor scientists. Specifically ones that are going to be used in cars (targeted killings) and high energy applications.

 

Life is cheap to the cabal, even if you're brilliant (especially so, actually).

Anonymous ID: d558b4 Feb. 16, 2018, 9:57 a.m. No.397982   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>397965

 

You're right, he posts meaningless things.

 

He asked that question in response to someone who asked about aliens. He's wanting you to realize that even the nearest star is outside the range of space flight.