>>3976840 (pb)

Hey anon, I think maybe you could improve on this image by clarifying twatter post time was at 18:40 and choosing your timestamp boxes better. There are some interesting correlations between the time stamps of the 8 posts and the 18:06, 18:20, and 18:34 times listed on the schedule.

>>3977486

Hey there you are, I made a post for you:

>>3977457

>>3977599

It may well serve as a proof later, no need to make any leaps in attaching it to past posts right now. But the way you connected those two time markers is not sensible, so I am agreeing with the other poster

>>397759

and offering a suggestion is all.