>>3985580 (pb)

Gotta admit, this shit is funny as hell. Let's just say she really was innocently referencing the literal Q train. I'm just trying to imagine what she's thinking getting swamped with "Q sent me" and "justice is coming" memes.

If that is the case then we look like bunch of crazy bastards but it's still hilarious.

I'm starting to think this drop is pretty significant, beyond whatever those numbers mean. If you look at The comments in Maggie Haberman's tweet, it's all Q memes and comments.

She's a very well-known reporter for NYT so if nobody asks "the question" after she gets bombarded by Q, something isn't right.

>>3985945

Forgot to attach the drop. Fuck.

WTF?! Why would twatter censor this? Of all the things that could be marked as offensive, this gets flagged? How? What is it about this image?

>>3986068

>>3986055

Hmm… So this would seem to prove that twitter can compare similar images but not the text itself. Somebody must've used this on twitter and now similar memes get flagged even though they ain't cussin.

>>3986347

Why would he advertise this before he get their testimony? The Clintons are going to kill them now so this probably won't happen. Thanks Mark….