Anonymous ID: c7586d Nov. 21, 2018, 1:56 p.m. No.3987410   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7595 >>7802

>>3987314

>>3987355

Started with me not fully into the while Qclock thing. I dont see how Q and crew could come up with this almighty plan to oust the swamp and tie it to a Qclock. He was argueing that they are using a Quantum computer. And my areguement to that is how do you write a program that predicts the outcome of human reaction to politics.

 

The only way I could see that is if it was an actual Turing type AI.

 

While I must admit that it is possible. Im pretty convinced that Quantum computing now exists.

 

But even so. A computer would have to be conscious of human emotion and reactions etc. How do you actually put a number on that?

 

I guess my point is that I just dont see how Q and crew sat down years ago and saidโ€ฆ OK were gonna get rid of the swamp. So on this date this will happen, then on this date this will happen etc. Just way too impossible to predict politics.

 

IMHO

Anonymous ID: c7586d Nov. 21, 2018, 2:55 p.m. No.3987923   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>3987895

agreed. thanks to all soldiers. I tried for years to keep young men from going to iraq and Afghanistan, trying to wake them up. But pussy likes a man in uniform soโ€ฆ Nonetheless thanks for trying to serve. Even though it was the wrong people.

Anonymous ID: c7586d Nov. 21, 2018, 3:05 p.m. No.3988039   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8055 >>8057

>>3987984

I dont have any sauce, but over the past few years, with the rate of technology, my gut feeling is that they do. A few years ago Intel was doing reseach on 86 core processors, but suddenly seemed to drop it. Which leads me to believe they have found a new technology that now outdates multi core for speed. That would be quantum.