>>398908

>>398886

forgot something:

>My signatures all reference upcoming events about to drop if this hasn't been caught on.

>>398920

>Why is this relevant?

<?tnveler siht si yhW

>>398950

oy, someone's not had their Covfefe. Just having a bit'o fun, mate.

Go ahead with your idea, it's not terrible at all. Any angle to analyze the crumbs is better than most of the wankfest we see out here.

At least start… so, so many anons come here with ideas and suggestions, so few of them realize it could take off if they'd just start working on it instead of asking/hoping someone to appear and do it for them…

>>399099

start by READING THE BREAD TOP POSTS, there's plenty of archives/spreadsheets/pdfs

geeeezus

>>399099

also, not a filtersignaling fag, but a warning to newfags: "???" = filter

>>399112

well the question is valid, just the way/place to ask it, a little less so.

Seriously, if you need to be told what to do, you are not at the right place. Be careful. You will get trolled/misled.

Best thing you can do is read, learn, read, learn.

Talk to people. Plenty other ways to spread the good word without linking to here.

Save the graphic maps linked at top, send them those.

Complete Q txt files.

Spreadsheet with answers.

Plenty options… Godspeed and sorry (just a little bit) for screaming

>>399207

um, we have list of lists here. maybe use these instead of the reddits?

maybe we should have a newfag trap like Ms. M.J. Rodasher at the start of every bread.

Then anons can filter all the idiots that fall for it

WIN

>>399270

https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Over_Various_Feeds_Electronically_for_Engagement_Act ?

>>399326

>uses namefield

>expects us to feed info to a youtuber when he's already lurking here/doing it himself

<what was the point of this if not getting more subs to your channel?

yes youtubers exist, good on ya. some aren't completly horrible. now let the grownups work please

>>399384

has it dropped from bread already? some anons were working on that last night…

damn, must be in notable posts somewhere, not seeing it pop up… damn we have a hard time holding on to info/building on it

>>399464

>You have just outed yourself as an idiot.

oh, the irony…

(guys seriously. anon who wrote that must be laughing at every new reply he's getting him, and daaayum y'all are feeding him way more than the effort put in his troll)

>>399513

organizing of tasks

list of lists (threads existing already like Resignations + others that should be started), etc…

there were many(or at least a few) anons on it, at least a few posts made it into bread, sorry to be so vague :/

>>399418

it was either that or just a straight-up troll…

i prefer to think it was the former

>>399609

Definitely not defending the Rothschilds, but keep in mind art/surrealism exists, and was very fashionable in 60/70s. Also Dali.

Of coure the whole "art market" is cover for all sortsa things, but is not in and of itself "proof"… the Bizarre is not enough, and if you hold it up as such, normies will norm

>>399631

you do bring up a good point that some archives focus too much on Q only, and loose good info.

Like that time Q confirmed Seth Rich's MS13 killers with just a reply of an anon's post, long before he got back on the subject