>>3991202 (pb)
High-visibility output
http://global-mind.org/gcpdot/gcpchart.php
for some reason I seem to be hyper-attuned to numbers/patters (basically, gets) tonight…
something's happening…
pegging and holding steady.
view the full site then, here.
Explains better than I could really
http://global-mind.org/gcpdot/
ty to previous-anon for posting last bread.
the long n the short of it is there are a series of computers dispersed around the world in which random numbers are generated and sampled.
The variance between those random numbers around the globe have a statistical 'average' of matching vs not matching.
The graph is the variance from the statistical norm - and it has pegged out at specific times in the past 20 (25?) years, either high or low, on days such as 9/11, Obama election victory, inaguration, leaving office, DJT Inaguration etc.
It's an ongoing research project to track variance from statical norms when squared off with major geo-political or social events and, thus far, it's been pretty accurate.
It going apeshit tonight is notable. In a big way.
naw you're the equivalent of a 14 year old girl telling a room full of guys she's ugly fishing for attention and I'm done with you.
hmm
check my other response. I gave what I understand it as, by way of a rundown.
np
I'd forgotten about ti until the original anon posted it last bread.
Ran across it several years ago while looking into simulated reality theories - this project is one of the major datapoints in favor of us living in a simulation…
Hi Cherry (2000)
does the robot have nice tits and can it avoid toothy bjs?
odds are good most of those interacting with it are shills sitting 2 -3 cubes over, giving it legitimacy.
Stop feeding the shills.
it's pretty hard 'to' argue against it.
The very fact that we live in a probabilistic universe vs deterministic, pretty much slams the door shut on most arguments against.
fuck this slut. She was bangin avanetti - that alone says skank.
So unless/until tits/kitty idgaf
not femanons. attention whores.
>>3992210, >>3992314 Morality returning? Lowest U.S. Abortion rates since Roe v. Wade
nope. SJW virtue signallers can't get it up - or don't know how to talk their way into bed. Or goin trans/bi/whatever
add to that, the wahmen are intolerable for the most part and also goin trans/bi/whatevs, well, less fucking
less fucking = less insemination. Which means less abortions.
If anything I'd say it's the 'increased' immorality that's contributing to this.
jealousy is very unattractive. You should try to keep that under control anon.
Thanks. Your worship is noted.
effectively the same thing.
'hacks' are simply exploits of code defects, unless you have direct access to the source & storage or transport.
what are methamphetamines?
overclocking…
Psychedelics?
photoshop filters…
but now I'm just gettin weird with it. in all seriousness though I greatly enjoy discussing simulation theory so I should probably 'not' any more. Already in the mid-high 20's on post count this bread.
down some - but trending back up again as I type this
uh that's over Nebraska…
I honestly couldn't say.
Just suffice to say being 'not green' for any extended period is unusual. Being Red/Orage taht long - weird. Ditto earlier today, blues.
Go look up Global Consciousness Project on youtube.
Plenty of documentaries. It 'is' a research project and not so much a public service or entertainment site - so yes, it probably could use better explanation, but we're not really the target audience.
So this topic is actually 'exactly' where the NPC meme came from.
Strong evidence points to only about 1 in 3 people actually have an internal monologue, strongly suggesting 'filler' entities - npcs.
Add in things like the Heisenberg uncertainty principal being a pretty reasonable comparison to 'zooming in' and the higher zoom, the worse the resolution graphically.
Then being probability based vs deterministic universe, well, if the pieces fit together, and they start looking like a duck, it's pretty safe to say you're putting together a duck puzzle.