>>3992559 (lb)

>>3992579 (lb)

given the context I think he did mean DMT not DNA - but you raise a good point too.

More likely DNA would equate to the JSON (or whatever) data structure making up individual objects (people/animals etc)

DMT? hm Multi-core processing maybe?

Access to higher-order functions?

idk, I was mostly being silly with the drug representations earlier but yeah, interesting. I'd have to think on that one. Doesn't help that I've never tried DMT.

LSD/shrooms/coke/adderall, etc. yes.

not really my thing but moving the consciousness that standard deviation was worth it.

peaking again

>>3992683

yes

>>3992683

>>3992697

possibly but not necessarily.

Being the night before Thanksgiving in itself could be the cause.

Apparently, Dec 31/Jan 1 it goes all sideways too, as well as other … emotionally charged days.

>>3992723

oh I know what it is.

Between Joe Rogan and Graham Hancock I'd say I'm as informed as one can be, without actually having tried it.

But I 'am' also going to watch the vid :)

ty.

>>3992735

bull shit.

That you would even utter 'like any other drug' outs your lack of knowledge on the topic.

Each drug has its own personality - and even different batches and cuts of the same drug can be radically different.

still peaking

>>3992848

you as well fren

appears I've misplaced some of my memes so you get this one instead. :)

>>3992853

what's with the sudden fixation on this chick around here lately?

I mean yeah, she's hot as fuck - but I'm kinda gettin sick of seein her…

>>3992856

psychological addiction is a thing.

>>3992894

>>3992876

I think that one or both of you are conflating addiction with psychological dependence.

And yes, i agree, it was almost certainly somethign else that killed her as to imbibe a lethal dose of THC/Pot would require such high levels as to have asphyxiated from lack of oxygen long since.

>>3992913

addiction indicates physiological effects from cessation.

psychological dependence does not.

There is a difference.

>>3992920

that's still happening?

I would have thought that'd be resolved by now

>>3992924

I already agreed with you on that point.

>>3992919

No idea. Not really a debate I'm interested in either, just pointing out there 'is' a difference and both are real.

Psychological dependence is akin to children getting overly attached to a stuffed animal or blanket. It is security, it is belief that you need something to be 'normal' and fear or anxiety caused when you cannot have it.

Addiction is a physical 'need' to stave off ill effects of cessation.

>>3992949

>>3992927

sigh. (you)'d myself on accident… it's getting late and I'm getting bad

>>3992944

can happen with abuse of anything.

some peopel shouldn't 'ever' try drugs because they just can't handle it.

For those that can, they should at least dabble. Try once and then leave alone.

1 dose of shrooms or LSD moves your consciousness 1 standard deviation toward being more creative and empathetic.

Great for conservatives, frankly, because generally we're dicks. Helps us soften up some.

>>3992958

have you met all MJ users?

No?

Then it's a shit argument.

>>3992982

sorry anon, not calling you out specifically.

it's been the past week or two, almost all ya see :\

>>3992990

naw.

Havn't touched anything stronger than nicoteine/caffiene in 20 years but you're awful defensive so whatevs.

Try again?

>>3993010

because it is.

'I've never met… so it must be so'

it's a shit argument.

>>3993005

don't believe I said otherwise, did I?

'some' people are susceptible to psychological dependence.

the vast majority are not.

>>3993035

ooohhh

An idea I disagree with, therefore, jooos!

nice, ever had a thought that wasn't fed to you? No? I'm not surprised.

>>3993071

>>3993041

>still not beneficial like exercising, reading, tinkering in the garage, etc.

You're completely discounting the creative benefits - as well as, in many cases, pure focus benefits.

Like 70's music? Then you like the product of drug use.

Like intense graphics or art? Then odds are pretty good you like the product of drug use.

Writing/books? same thing.

If someone lives their life indulging in only one thing then it doesn't matter if it's being a gym rat or a drug addict, the result will largely be the same - a broken body, shattered, stressed out mind and unhealthy social life.

But it is possible to have a broad range of interests and activities.

And I get it, you're against drug use. Great! But try to avoid being preachy about it. In return, I'll not try to win you over into trying.

>>3992999

Know what happens to those that 'abuse' weight lifting/running?

They end up popping pain killers - asprin, ibuprofen, etc (or worse) and kill their kidneys.

I work out 5 days / week, and 2x a day on tues/thurs. so I'm probably easily 'as' aware as you are of the benefits, and based on your line of argumentation, more aware of the risks. Still squat over 500 at 45 yrs old, and bench over 300. so I don't 'go easy' either.

But there's trade offs. My ego and vanity means I do my best to stay at a certain level, even though it's becoming more likely I'm going to suffer a severe injury as I get older. At which point, I stop.

>>3993143

Probably has more to do with the fact tha it never should have been a Schedule I drug to begin with.

The only reason 'why' it is is a combination of the Paper lobby and the Alcahol lobby.

But go ahead and tell me your story about the joos and mind control…

>>3993156

trolling skid row for more votes.

>>3993162

8 out of every 10 brunettes are at best, 6's on the 1-10 scale.

But those remaining 2 are 9's or 10's.

>>3993164

There was a time where one could buy a case of dynamite, a gatelin gun and boxes of ammunition at a general store too.

What's your point?

>>3993150

MDMA and DMT both have been proven to be near instant-cures for PTSD and Iawasca has shown remarkable success in treating other addictions.

But to get people to see the benefits, you must first get them to stop seeing the fear mongering.

>>3993186

So are we arguing the same point? That the government is too involved in areas they have no business in?

>>3993200

np

i'm not particularly keeping track of who I'm responding to, if I get a (you)

welcome to the discussion!

>>3993203

uh… that's a 2 at best.

And I wasn't explicitly implying that. Just that in general Brunettes are pretty … plain. But the hot ones? they're SMOKIN hot.

picsrelated.

>>3993209

yup…

I already had to back off considerably what I was able to do in my 20's. Played D1 CFB as a sack specialist LB so I'm sure you can imagine I've had to let a lot slide.

But then I don't need that level of strength training any more and that IS hard on the body. My knees… ugh…

>>3993218

agree

>>3993224

Well

Allow me to introduce you to a few:

Megan Rain

Tori Black

Emma Glover

Jessica Rex

Lexie Fox

Elena Koshka…

that's enough for now. keep you busy for a few weeks :D

>>3993233

tits have no provenance anon

but since you're critical of those 2, here's an alternate

>>3993251

real or fake I'll hold em all, as long as they aren't Tara Reid fake

Ok at this point I 'am' starting to wonder what's going on - or about to go on…

I wish SJW's hadn't fucked with social media so much.

Youtube is boring now :(

>>3993315

agree, all but the last however.

Respect for others to make their own choices extends to not attempting to proselytize beliefs or as well.

So

This has been an odd pair of breads.

Start off talking about Global Consciousness, move from there to Simulation theory and then on to drug use.

Mostly good discussions too.

Something's wrong…

>>3993363

maybe I can draw the baker into another epic (you) troll again…

>>3993329

because we're human and have human interests - as well as many of us relish actually holding a real discussion occasionally.

Since the shills appear to be letting shit be for once, or at least low volume, why not?

>>3993400

oh now on that we're absolutely on the same page.