Anonymous ID: 649d84 Nov. 22, 2018, 2:02 p.m. No.3998279   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8346

Is AFLB still around?

Because I think that Anti-Fungal Leaf Bread is none other

than Toronto's famous Bob Allisat

Who first appeared on the scene in the days of

USENet and FreeNET and the early Internet

And is still seen writing letters to the editor in his hometown.

Anonymous ID: 649d84 Nov. 22, 2018, 2:10 p.m. No.3998317   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

The embedded video answers What is a Technocracy? in 3 mins.

 

A Case for Technocracy in America

 

https://www.fairobserver.com/politics/technocracy-america-politics-economics-us-news-42511/

 

In America, the left gets painted with a much broader brush, but there are differences. The point is to talk about one segment โ€” a group that isnโ€™t made up of cultural Marxists, social justice warriors and socialists. This a group has been quietly generalized, overshadowed by our peers who scream about neoliberalism and subscribe to ideologies that are a mix of political prefixes and suffixes. Plodding, working, moseying along in the American left is a group often derogatorily called the technocrats. Some may hide their technocratic virtues, while others just donโ€™t know they have them yet.

 

Exposure to the term technocrat usually comes from conspiracy theory propagandists like Alex Jones and Patrick Wood, who indict technocrats as leaders in globalist plots to control the masses. But outside of talk radio and conspiracy podcasts, technocrats are public servants with technical expertise โ€” managers, budgeters. The term has often been associated with nerds or wonks. Technocrats do, while politicians give speeches. The 28th president of the United States, Woodrow Wilson, fit the bill. He was an academic โ€” a political scientist who helped found the field of public administration, at a time when the discipline of public policy was fledgling and far from the science it is today.

Anonymous ID: 649d84 Nov. 22, 2018, 2:40 p.m. No.3998491   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8633

>>3998435

 

Fuck off shill

We are on to you JIDF Clowns pretending to be patriots,

 

The proof is in the pudding.

Did Q say this about you?

 

They want you DIVIDED.

DIVIDED you are WEAK.

TOGETHER you are STRONG.

There was no attempt to DIVIDE.

There was however a strategic move to REVEAL.

 

You, mr. shill, are trying to DIVIDE

NeonRevolt looks to me like a strategic move to reveal.

When I post my digs on this board for free

It is there for anyone else to borrow and reuse however they want.

I don't care if they use it on a pay site if it helps educate more normies.

Heck, I don't even mind if someone reuses my dig in a post on this board

And gets it into BAKER notables

Like one of the notables that is up there right NOW!!!

I even suggested that Baker use that othe Anon's work

Anonymous ID: 649d84 Nov. 22, 2018, 2:50 p.m. No.3998554   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8701

>>3998456

 

Notice there are 5 horses in the painting, all with coats of different coloring, and she is wearing a white dress and has positioned her head directly under the head of the white horse. There must be some occult symbolism here. Possibly the grey represents her husband, E.L. (whose initials happen to be Hebrew for God). If we knew more about the relatives in this branch of the bloodline, it may help interpret.

 

Note that people say the Illuminati bloodlines keep their genealogy secret and do not write it down. I find it hard to believe that so many generations over the centuries can keep things straight. However, what if they DO record it, but not in written records like bookkeeping? What if they use paintings of their horses to encode their genealogy. Even though LDR was supposedly born to a family in the USA, it could have been one of those private fostering relationships, and they recorded in this painting that she was part of E.L.'s bloodline and that is why she is with him now?

 

To understand the above message, you have to be able to identify the actual picture above the mantle in LdR's house in the UK. It's the one with 5 horses.

Anonymous ID: 649d84 Nov. 22, 2018, 2:56 p.m. No.3998603   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8765

>>3998555

 

What makes you think the two phrases refer to different people?

 

If Trump knew that Gina Haspell was running the rogue CIA agents in the UK and coordinating with the rogue MI6 agents there, he might have promoted her to get her back in DC where she can be watched and her comms can be monitored. It also breaks the link with MI6, especially if something was done on the MI6 side at the same time.

 

Remember, Q said that We are in control.

 

It was under Gina's watch that the US Embassy London was moved to a building that is almost next door to MI-6 HQ. Close enough to build a secret tunnel connecting the two buildings.

 

Exactly what was the nature of the SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP between the UK and USA since Churchill's time? Was it, in fact, control by the top echelon of the Illuminati?

 

I do not believe that Wikipedia is describing it truthfully:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Relationship