Do you think serious charges will drop against a lot of sitting and former Congress after 1/1/19? Seems to me it's then or never. Awan should be good for 40 more down. FISA at least a dozen? How about the sexual settlements list? Let's see that. The Trump DOJ hasnt done squat against the govt crooks.
Will some of the retiring Congressional R's reappear on Military Tribunals with authority designated to civilians under the revised 1/1/19 UCMJ?
Hey, actual canonical research. I'm stunned!
Vince needs to declare an early tentative VP pick.
Through her extreme crooked incompetence, she exposed the vast crookedness of the demonicrats, /their/ true nature. She was chosen to destroy /them/.
NavySealThreatFag killed AFLB.
That's Toots' kitten, on the blow already. Sad!
Air is dramtically improved on the Bay, but the nose, throat and chest congestion will take a few days of good breathing. 14 days of unhealthy air took its toll.
Ikr, the Aviante misdemeanor is a slam-dunk case. It's over for /them/ after that.
She's prolly lurking on here rn with her freakishly long hands and fingers hovering over the keyboard, preparing to start shitposting a year's worth of pent-up twats.
RIP CARROTS LIL FIGHTER. (You were delicious btw)
It's implausible that there are no leaks over a year.
That was kek.
Unless Military Tribunals are put in place for /their/ trials.
There are many Matisse paintings in Russia and in the USA, this looks to be from a joint exhibit in the old USSR and the USA.
Real Killary is wearing a back brace and cant walk up 3 stairs unassisted.
My point is the so-called sealed indictments are unlikely to exist for over a year with zero leaks. This has nothing to do with the WH, they are supposedly in courts all over the land, which means NUMEROUS people would have seen them. The lack of leaks is not plausible.
No leaks is implausible.
Trump should try to remove a few judges and state AGs for cause and put them on trial to defend their unlawful decisions. That will sober them up.