Anonymous ID: e6aaec Nov. 22, 2018, 5:48 p.m. No.4000131   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0154 >>0161

>>3999924

No worries, I haven't seen anyone else post it either. Just FYI there was a big blow-up the other day about a supposedly "comped" graveyard baker, which sparked a debate about making sure notables are sauced. Anons are watching pretty close for that now, so it should be easier for you to sift through shill slides and legit content.

ty baker!

Anonymous ID: e6aaec Nov. 22, 2018, 5:52 p.m. No.4000166   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0187

>>4000111

>maps that had already been posted in either that bread

yeah that's what I meant by sauceโ€“can you post those URL's for us? It would help to resolve a debate that raged for days whether it was a shill slide or not. ty!

Anonymous ID: e6aaec Nov. 22, 2018, 6:01 p.m. No.4000268   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0306

>>4000187

Yeah it went on days and was really distressing to us Cali Anons. The thing is there was no URL sauce in any of the posts aligning the fires to the rails and you'd said you'd seen them so I was hoping you had the URL link. Not the cap of the map, anyone could put shoop that up, but the sauce of where the maps came from. I can't find that in any of the breads or any of the notables that had the caps.

But yeah I totally get you're baking now, so just when you have a chance, if you could post that link to URL sauce to resolve this issue, that would be help. It still actually resurfaces kekโ€“the theory and counter-theory debate.