>>4000328

thank you baker

>>4000306 lb

>with an explanation and sauce

Ah, I think this is the confusion. And this is what the debate was about later–what constitutes sauce. A pic or cap isn't sauce unless it contains a URL link to where it can be independently verified, otherwise a shill can just shoop something up, take a cap and call it "sauce." Was just wondering whether the original rail claim ever had this kind of URL sauce–"real" sauce, kek.

>if i was wrong then i was wrong

Not trying to give you a hard time baker, everyone makes mistakes, just didn't want you to get caught in another shill slide if that's what it was is all.

>>4000440

>i know a pic or cap isn't sauce,

It's all good, no reason to assume you put something in notes w/o sauce if you remember otherwise. I'm sure someone could go back and check but you're right, since you've also admitted you could be wrong, what difference, at the point, does it make? If the URL for those caps exists, I'm sure it will surface at some point. Or if was just shills and anons aren't biting they'll eventually give up.

Thanks again baker!

>>4000542

What difference, at this point, does it make?