Anonymous ID: f5a49d Nov. 22, 2018, 8:01 p.m. No.4001258   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4001219

I don’t know, Power accepted her role in some of the activity, whereas if she were trying to pass off the unmasking as someone else’s doing, I would imagine she’d have denied it all.

Anonymous ID: f5a49d Nov. 22, 2018, 8:24 p.m. No.4001460   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1824

>>4001401

 

The star that keeps us alive has, over the last few years, been almost free of sunspots, which are the usual signs of the Sun’s magnetic activity. Everything indicates that the Sun is going into some kind of hibernation, and the obvious question is what significance that has for us on Earth.

 

If you ask the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which represents the current consensus on climate change, the answer is a reassuring “nothing”. But history and recent research suggest that is probably completely wrong. Why? Let’s take a closer look.

 

Solar activity has always varied. Around the year 1000, we had a period of very high solar activity, which coincided with the Medieval Warm Period. But after about 1300 solar activity declined and the world began to get colder. It was the beginning of the episode we now call the Little Ice Age.

 

It’s important to realise that the Little Ice Age was a global event. It ended in the late 19th Century and was followed by increasing solar activity. Over the past 50 years solar activity has been at its highest since the medieval warmth of 1000 years ago. But now it appears that the Sun has changed again, and is returning towards what solar scientists call a “grand minimum” such as we saw in the Little Ice Age.

 

The match between solar activity and climate through the ages is sometimes explained away as coincidence. Yet it turns out that, almost no matter when you look and not just in the last 1000 years, there is a link. Solar activity has repeatedly fluctuated between high and low during the past 10,000 years. In fact the Sun spent about 17 per cent of those 10,000 years in a sleeping mode, with a cooling Earth the result.

 

You may wonder why the international climate panel IPCC does not believe that the Sun’s changing activity affects the climate. The reason is that it considers only changes in solar radiation. That would be the simplest way for the Sun to change the climate – a bit like turning up and down the brightness of a light bulb.

 

Satellite measurements have shown that the variations of solar radiation are too small to explain climate change. But the panel has closed its eyes to another, much more powerful way for the Sun to affect Earth’s climate. In 1996 we discovered a surprising influence of the Sun – its impact on Earth’s cloud cover. High-energy accelerated particles coming from exploded stars, the cosmic rays, help to form clouds.

 

[C]limate scientists try to ignore this possibility. If the Sun provoked a significant part of warming in the 20th Century, then the contribution by CO2 must necessarily be smaller.

 

The outcome may be that the Sun itself will demonstrate its importance for climate and so challenge the theories of global warming. No climate model has predicted a cooling of the Earth – quite the contrary. And this means that the projections of future climate are unreliable. A forecast saying it may be either warmer or colder for 50 years is not very useful, and science is not yet able to predict solar activity.

 

So in many ways we stand at a crossroads. The near future will be extremely interesting. I think it is important to accept that Nature pays no heed to what we humans think about it. Will the greenhouse theory survive a significant cooling of the Earth? Not in its current dominant form. Unfortunately, tomorrow’s climate challenges will be quite different from the greenhouse theory’s predictions. Perhaps it will become fashionable again to investigate the Sun’s impact on our climate.

Anonymous ID: f5a49d Nov. 22, 2018, 8:41 p.m. No.4001580   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1613

>>4001541

I’m not with you, the message says that all diplomats KNOWN BY ASSANGE are gone from th Embassy because the ambassador recalled was the last one known to assange. Ecuador still has a Uk presence, just staffed with new folks.

Anonymous ID: f5a49d Nov. 22, 2018, 8:49 p.m. No.4001637   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1644

>>4001603

The misleading translation is tous les diplomates connus par Assange —all known diplomats #Assange….

 

Should be all the diplomats “known by Assange”

 

The point is that all his supportive Ecuadorians have left the Embassy. There are new Ecuadorian diplomats who view assange differently.

 

C