Anonymous ID: 623939 Nov. 22, 2018, 9:50 p.m. No.4002096   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2101 >>2120 >>2139 >>2161 >>2258

>>4002023

This wikileaks doc is now notable w/o sauce why?

>>4001976 Spanish translation of Ecadorian decree in Wikileaks tweet

 

Baker, if you don't anchor yourself to objective standards, shills will always be able to worm their way in. The solution to being able to stand your ground is to define the ground on which you stand, otherwise it's shifting sand. One of those objective standards here is: factual claims require independently verifiable primary sauce

 

If you do choose to note it, at least alert anons it's unsauced in the description. While we appreciate the help baking, it is not a net gain for our work here if we allow our standards to suffer merely to assuage feels.

Anonymous ID: 623939 Nov. 22, 2018, 10:08 p.m. No.4002247   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2269 >>2273 >>2294 >>2308

>>4002139

Baker you are misunderstanding the intent of my advice. We are truth seekers. We deal in facts. If you continue to flout that you will not have the support of anons. Don't shoot the messenger, step up your discernment. Yelling at people without substance to back it up doesn't make you tough. This is why shills are wearing you down, you don't believe your own tough talk. You're standing on shifting sand. Define the ground with objective standards, with truth, so that it's solid. Don't cuck when you're in the right, but be honest in admitting mistakes when you're not. Only then can you withstand attack.

Anonymous ID: 623939 Nov. 22, 2018, 10:14 p.m. No.4002306   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4002273

>are you a baker?

yup

>fuck off with your advice

some people would rather feel right

in the place where they now stand

than experience the discomfort of growth

that spurs moving to higher ground

 

Your choice

Anonymous ID: 623939 Nov. 22, 2018, 10:31 p.m. No.4002425   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2445

>>4002258

>thats not really how it works

What's not–dealing in facts? Are you suggesting we deal in thumbs ups, likes and upvotes now? Is truth a popularity contest?

 

I'm not a shill. Shills don't try to get people to make themselves stronger by holding themselves to the kind of standards that prevent deception, infiltration and degradation. We lost our nations by allowing our values to slide, this place is the last bastion. Just because we were invaded by normies and redditors doesn't mean we have to lie down and let 'em turn this place into yet another controlled outlet of misinformation. If we don't set a high bar and defend it we won't withstand what's ahead. Q said we're the frame. We can't let him down.

 

Didn't want to create a slide of infighting tho, I'll leave it there and will call it a night.