This wikileaks doc is now notable w/o sauce why?
>>4001976 Spanish translation of Ecadorian decree in Wikileaks tweet
Baker, if you don't anchor yourself to objective standards, shills will always be able to worm their way in. The solution to being able to stand your ground is to define the ground on which you stand, otherwise it's shifting sand. One of those objective standards here is: factual claims require independently verifiable primary sauce
If you do choose to note it, at least alert anons it's unsauced in the description. While we appreciate the help baking, it is not a net gain for our work here if we allow our standards to suffer merely to assuage feels.