Anonymous ID: 329cc8 Feb. 16, 2018, 2:30 p.m. No.400759   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0802 >>1210

>Why is everything 'really' made in China?

 

If everything includes electronic components used for sensitive applications like targeting and guidance systems in our military aircraft and Navy vessels, hardware at nuclear plants– really everywhere– and we can accept that our politicians have sold us out to our enemies in order to maintain power, it shouldn't be hard to believe that deals were made to knowingly and deliberately allow components to be purchased, distributed and installed that were infected and/or explicitly designed to serve nefarious purposes for those that would like to see our demise.

 

>Cost savings?

 

What is the cost, specifically in the long run? Financially it may look like we as taxpayers are saving some coin by doing business specifically with China, but at what cost that cannot be measured simply in dollars.. Things are tense with China and have been for at least a decade, much more so than most Americans realize. Now imagine if things went hot, and they were able to cripple even a small fraction of our warfighting hardware– this is terrifying.

 

>Why is POTUS focused on SA/CHINA/RUSSIA?

 

SA own our politicians financially and likely with blackmail material, China has the electronic means to do us serious damage, and Russia seems to have the will to use both, and the strength to make us consider it as a possibility. But as to China specifically, leveling that playing field has been a very high priority for POTUS since he first threw his hat in the ring as a candidate. They are doing us of in more ways than one and want to do us have harm.

 

>WHY???????????

 

War. War equals tremendous profit– not for people like us, for people with the power to get us into hot conflicts in the first place.

 

>WHY IS RUSSIA BEING USED AGAINST POTUS?

 

Of the major antagonists– Russia, China, Iran, NK, Pakistan, Turkey, and let's throw in SA because until the recent purge, they have only been the friends of the elite– the potential for a "tear down this wall" moment in history is most likely to be accomplished by Trump, with Russia. But the general populace only knows what they are fed by the MSM, which is that Russia is Babayega, the Boogeyman. At least 65 million Americans are uninformed enough to vote for Hillary Clinton, and nearly every person in the MSM is of the same political persuasion. If POTUS can be made to appear to be dealing with a mortal enemy in Russia, politically speaking it makes a legitimate peace deal difficult to achieve.

 

>WHY RUSSIA?

 

IMO, Russia is a half brother, and your parents talk a bunch of shit about each other. The average American has far more in common with the average Russian than not. We love our families, we love our God, and we love our country. We want to be free to do as we please and left the fuck alone, and if someone wants to fuck with our country we are vicious in her defense.

 

>WHY IS POTUS FOCUSED ON BRINGING BACK MANUFACTURING?

 

I relate it to my first answer. Why leave the manufacturing of sensitive electronic components used in American computers and systems in the hands of anyone other than Americans? See this article for how serious this issue is:

https:// www.military. com/defensetech/2012/05/30/smoking-gun-proof-that-military-chips-from-china-are-infected

 

>JOBS?

 

Just about every job in this country– aside from politician– can be seen as an exercise of the liberties and benefits we enjoy as Americans, and a contributor to the well-being of the country by contributing to the economy and society as a whole. Why hire anyone other than Americans to accomplish this? Which leads to…

 

>SECURITY?

 

Can you expect a Pakistani national, here on a green card and working for a tech company to send money back to his family, to have the same core values and loyalties as a natural born and bred American citizen? How about illegal aliens from any country, who are willing to disrespect our rule of law and disrespect our legal process by entering and staying in this country, in order to work for money that they send to other countries? If we cannot ensure that the motivations and loyalties of a person in this country are not 100% firmly in the interests of this country even at the expense of time needed to become a legal citizen, they should be considered a security risk and should not be here.

 

>CONTROL?

 

If we can't assume loyalty, we must be able to control who comes here, who stays, and who goes.

 

>TRUE CONTROL?

 

We the people hold the key to true control, but change is only affected when we put our gorgeous autistic melon brains toward it with the same attention and dedication that we have all given to what we have going here.

 

>WHO CAN YOU TRUST?

 

Just my opinion, but trust yourself and your creator. Aside from that, you glorious faggots are still high up on the list.

Anonymous ID: 329cc8 Feb. 16, 2018, 2:31 p.m. No.400769   🗄️.is 🔗kun

As a side note, thinking about China.. Some of you dedicated faggots might remember November 8, 2010. That day, a traffic helicopter in the Los Angeles market filmed an object burning a trail into the sky from out on the horizon. It took 72 hours for anyone with the authority to give an "official position" on the matter, something that usually happens inside of 24 hours. It was explained away as a flight from Honolulu to Phoenix. In that 72 hours, you had experts from Jane's, pilots, and literal rocket scientists saying that no, it is in fact a missile. I believe Obama was in Indonesia/Philippines/Malaysia working on a trade deal at the time. Word around town is that two Chinese Jin-class subs were tracked for ten minutes 15 miles off of Catalina Island, then disappeared. A sub-launched ICBM is what was filmed. It's this something Q can confirm?