>>400304

Sorry to be a repostfag, it was at the end of the last moldy bread and i really wany to know what you all think.

———

Ok i have had this theory for awhile but never put it here. I believe that Q's late October posts had one purpose… to warn the cabal off of the planned nov 4 coup. We all (should) know that they were "all in" to force the immediate removal of Trump and Pence. You don't spring 150K for a full page nyt article as a joke.

Q made them think that the good guys were 2 steps ahead of them. And they blinked. The money needed for the operation dried up the weekend before. End of coup.

I don't know if Q always planned to use us after that or not. If not, i guess our autist reaction to his posts gave him the idea we are living out now.

But it is unfortunate that many people on "our side" cannot connect those dots, and discount every Q post since because of them.

Anyway, that's one anon's theory. I don't suppose you would care to confirm or deny, Q?

>>400637

The EO came after the Nov 4 planned coup. My whole point is that Q may have already saved the country once, and he involved us in it (those of us who were around then). I think that is cool. And if my guess about the reason for the disinfornation is true, it is brilliant on his part and it would help us "explain" those predictions when providing people with the "proofs".

>>400643

Seconded, re:Wictor and his "pals". When a conservative reacts violently against not just a source of info (Q) but belittles those that follow that info (us), something is definitely wrong. It makes me mistrust them in general as well. What possible motive do they have for this? I don't think Alex Jones is a good source of info but i would never call anyone an idiot who did. (Except in jest, of course)