Who is Tracy Beanz and why does she ruffle so many feathers??

I’m a long-time researcher. As far as Q digging goes,Tracy Beanz is an occasional source along with many others. I knew she was someone who used to follow Q and then no longer did. But it took me awhile to find a video in which she talks about her attitude towards Q research, which I’ll share in just a minute.

I first want to say this came up because I submitted a video earlier today from her and was jumped on from multiple anons making shill accusations instead of credible arguments. That video is attached to this post; check it out if you want some valuable information on election fraud.

But returning to Beanz, here is what she had to say about the Q work last Feb, starting at about minute 13:50:

“If you were to follow…completely fact-based, analytical stuff that comes out of there [the Q work]…you would find nothing but value, for the most part, about 95% is valuable information and that we need to explore….once you start getting the human side in to the equation….people need something to hope for, something to believe in….for many people, this was it….the information is good, I have yet to find disinformation inside of this…the speculative part I stay away from….so I focus on the factual part of it. And I just wish everybody would just respect each other’s opinions about it, if somebody doesn’t believe in it, that’s fine that’s ok, that doesn’t mean you have to hate… It’s not really beneficial to anyone.”

There’s more on the need for unity and not spending our time fighting with one another, but instead spending it winning, “because we’ve been winning.”

YES!!! We’re winning!! Let’s not forget that!!!

So my sense at this point? Tracy Beanz is a positive person and is in NO WAY anti-Q. She’s just not a fan of groupthink and encourages people to think for themselves. I welcome your comments, pro or con.

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1kKpBFN_64

>>4011201

Tim Canova Talks With Tracy Beanz : a tale of running against Debbie Wasserman-Shultz in a district with rampant corruption

IF YOU HATE TRACY BEANZ, please see the parent post before sending me negative comments on this posting.

Better yet, watch the video and judge its merits for yourself.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vq4qGnL-zGc

>>4011192

As soon as I heard Chief Justice Roberts criticize the President, I thought it was totally bizarre. No Chief Justice does that. And then there's the FISA court business. I don't know whether all of your speculations are totally correct, but this sure is intriguing. And makes sense as far as the SC goes.

>>4011209

>>4011217

>>4011218

>>4011220

>>4011234

>>4011274

Thanks your all your responses.

I didn't say I'm a long-time Q researcher. I was called to this work and belong here, but am not afraid to ask questions when I don't know the answers.

When I asked for feedback, I meant it.

So: When was the battle? I'll look it up if it's still online.

NOW: despite the battle, can you still be open-minded enough to watch the video that's attached? It has very good info.

OR do you all hate Beanz so much that you won't listen to someone on her show, even if they have something valuable to share?

We talk a lot about logic in this forum. But logic is useless if you can't set aside your dislikes enough to listen to someone with useful info–even your enemies.

>>4011233

Good luck, fren…the battle lines are drawn…but it's a damn shame, because THEY WANT US DIVIDED. And this is how it happens.

>>4011256

Yes, and elegant. May it come to pass.

>>4011345

She is not talking much, it's him. And what he has to say is worth listening to. But don't believe me, you can judge for yourself. I just put the info out after listening.

>>4011351

Thx for taking the time to explain. That kind of thing doesn't show up publicly.

>>4011361

Re: Beanz

You are surely adult enough to filter out things you don't like. There is plenty on this board that is designed to trigger people. Why is it any different for Beanz?

>>4011381

It's hard for people to remain dispassionate about things they care about.

>>4011386

>>4011192

>>4011316

I wasn't there so I don't know re "Q is a larp."

>>4011319

There have been many speculations about Mueller, as you know. But if he is a white hat, he is one helluva an actor.

>>4011321

I'm not Tracy, fren. Just another anon.

>>4011425

>>4011434

Don't you think you're getting a little paranoid here? Get a grip, guys.

>>4011415

I am willing to learn from anyone, brother.

>>4011473

Good theories are valuable, hard to come by

>>4011429

So is hard evidence

>>4011480

Just look at the crazy things in the MSM and outta the mouths of leading politicians–and now, even a Chief Justice. I've never seen politicians and the MSM talk the way they do now. Like on borders–nobody was saying crazy things even a few years ago. Now they are.

>>4011487

THEY WANT US DIVIDED. Is that what you want?

>>4011501

Yes, he's their trigger. He makes it impossible for them to hold their hatred inside. That's good–it all has to come out in the open. But it's hard to witness.

>>4011545

They are not really in control of their emotions at this point–that's why I see "panic in DC" reflected in their words and actions.

>>4011549

Have some popcorn.

>>4011554

Shills or unhappy patriots?

>>4011571

I've never understood why the 10 Dems wanted Assange indicted. Seems like he would cook their goose.

8-1-18: 10 Democrats ask Pence to help extradite Julian Assanage:

>https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/ten-democratic-senators-send-despicable-letter-to-mike-pence-targeting-journalist-julian-assange-34a46e0119d7

8-1-18: “Corrupt” SSCI wants Assange to testify before Congress:

>https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/08/08/highly-suspect-corrupt-senate-intelligence-committee-wants-to-interview-julian-assange-behind-closed-doors/

>>4011572

Agree.

>>4011594

I don't think they can get to him, though. They would offer him freedom in exchange for silence, but he's not the sort to make that kind of deal. But he has been in a bad situation now, and every man has his breaking point.

>>4011602

How can you know that for sure?

>>4011611

Your earlier remark about him being embraced by both sides–yes, that's true. It makes him unique. I rather admire him because I have a wild libertarian streak.

>>4011640

That is true. Really shows up on the caravan coverage. They never get into the details, never focus on funding, kicked off Judicial Watch guest because he spoke the truth, made Tucker and Ami Horowitz "speak in code" on the caravan, rely on Univision shill for "hands on" coverage, late to the scene for Tijuana demonstrations (at least they finally got there, thank God for small favors).

>>4011658

But these are the 10 Dems that are way up the food chain. I don't think they have any illusions. I think they had a plan, would set a trap, if they could.

>>4011670

Trumperland never gets old. Good pick me up along with this.

>>4011692

SR's family deserves to know what their son sacrificed.

>>4011192

Brilliant, anon.

>>4011769

I'm the poster of the video. And I notate most videos to save time for busy diggers. I do not notate videos to allow anons to nurse their emotional reactivity. I had other digs to do.

>>4011770

Don't know much about TJ, but good to see people stand up for their city. Paloma went there to report all by herself–gutsy gal. She told off the police for hiding behind their cars when the migrants started throwing rocks.

>>4011778

Sovereignty….a good word to hand onto.>>4011778

>>4011818

I always notate extensively, this was an exception, I was on another dig. Later the negative reaction didn't make me want to spend time notating something people would say is shit. Half the anons think I'm Beanz trying to shill them.

>>4011875

Thanks, fren, appreciate the feedback. I'll pass this time, but they'll be more news tomorrow.

>>4011925

That's a good question, anon. How would you go about answering it? Seems like it drops whenever Q hasn't been posting, when people feel like "nothing is happening" or when expected results fail to materialize.

It sorts of winnows down the field to those who will stay no matter what.

>>4011942

Then we'll all be here together, whatever the numbers….

Good night anons, end of bread….Godspeed to all