JUDGE THAT DECLARED CONGRESSIONAL FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION BAN UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTUALLY DECLARED THE JUDICIAL BRANCH AS SUPREME!

THIS DECISION IS REPUGNANT TO OUR US CONSTITUTION WHERE ALL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT ARE SUPPOSED TO BE EQUAL

I still say the Judge had no power or authority to throw out the FGM charges against the criminal defendants because this ONE JUDGE decided on his own that the Federal Ban was unconstitutional.

I've been researching to see if I could find where a lower Federal Court Judge even had power for judicial review in a criminal case. I'm coming up with nothing. Marbury vs. Madison was the first Judicial Review case but the judicial review power was up with the US Supreme Court in an original jurisdiction case.

The FGM case was a criminal trial in Federal Court before ONE JUDGE

I found this article from 1935 titled 'Limiting Judicial Review by Act of Congress' in which the issue is discussed at length

https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3789&context=californialawreview

The article states, " in practically no country in the world, other than the United States, can a statute passed by the national legislature be set aside by the courts.40"

WHAT HAPPENED IN THE 6TH CIRCUIT LAST WEEK…DECLARING ACT OF CONGRESS VOID….THE JUDICIARY IS DECLARING THEY ARE SUPREME!!!!

When a federal court decides that a state law contravenes the Constitution of the United States, the decision merely implies national supremacy;

but when a court, whether it be the Supreme Court or a justice court, declares a federal law void,

<that means the judiciary is supreme.

FAKE NEWS WON'T TALK ABOUT IT!

Of course, the fake news is not talking about this atrocious decision by ONE JUDGE that thinks he is SUPERIOR TO ALL OTHER BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT

Article on the FGM Ban as unconstitutional for those anons that didn't see it:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/female-genital-mutilation-michigan-doctor-unconstitutional-us-a8645091.html

>>4014072

>>4014084

>>4014031

^^Judicial Branch is claiming SUPREMACY over other branches of gov

We should all be VERY ALARMED by this slippery slope! What is going to happen with the 61,000+sealed indictments? Federal Judges are going to start arbitrarily declaring the acts that the prosecutions fall under as unconstitutional and throw out the charges?

Acts of Congress pass scrutiny in both houses, with the President and with the public before they become law. The FGM Ban was in place for 20 years before this first prosecution in the 6th Circuit came about! There was plenty of time for those that thought it was Unconstitutional to challenge it. The time/place to challenge a Congressional Act as Unconstitutional is not in the early part of a criminal trial as a defense for the criminals. The Executive Branch has exclusive power/discretion to bring the charges against criminals and it is not up to the Judicial Branch to find loopholes to throw those charges out.

>>4014162

>Arent they suppose to cite the specific law when they strike it down?

I don't think the Judicial Branch has the power to throw out the charges….the discretion to bring charges is up to the Executive Branch and then the trial moves forward. The trial determines if there is evidence to convict.

>>4014300

>>4014178

>>4014195

Simple solution is to have reliable audits and blockchain technology used to make sure all accounts are reconciled and all transactions are accounted for. Right now….auditors do not provide reliable audits and are corrupt.