Anonymous ID: 8d5548 Nov. 24, 2018, 2:43 p.m. No.4016932   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4016738

Mkay.

 

    • *

To the anons at end of last bread who disputed my use of the word "censor" in a filtering context:

One of the definitions of 'censor' is

to suppress or delete as objectionable

 

So when you SUPPRESS content that you find objectionable, you are CENSORING it from your mind.

My use of the term was accurate.

 

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. One anon's drink is another anon's poison. Here, everyone has a choice as to what they reject or allow to enter their mind.

Anonymous ID: 8d5548 Nov. 24, 2018, 2:49 p.m. No.4016996   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4016819

Me too.

 

Definition of insanity: To keep doing something over and over again that never worked before, in the vain hope that this time will be different.

Anonymous ID: 8d5548 Nov. 24, 2018, 3:02 p.m. No.4017114   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7311

>>4016828

We know about 4 servers, pic related.

 

One interpretation of

>What if access to the server(s) was deliberate?

is that HRC basically sold "subscriptions" to access her server, to foreign countries. Or made the security on it so weak that hacking was a foregone conclusion. We found evidence that a bit of code was installed on her email server that automatically routed a copy of every email to another node.

Sauce: Daily Mail article

New report claims Chinese embedded spyware to automatically forward every email to and from her secret server

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6107401/Did-CHINA-hack-one-Hillarys-secret-emails.html

 

Anyway, thank you for your speculation linking the various crumbs together!