>>4044470
Look, I do not want to argue with you. But in defense the people you bash, let us consider what is written in the Greek version of the new testament.
It says Pilate wrote "King of the Jews" on the execution stake in three different languages, Hebrew (Aramaic), Latin and Greek. See John 19:19. All of these languages were common at that time why else would Pilate use all 3? The area was on a trading route and many peoples were there. Also, the scripture where Peter's accent gives him away as being from the Galil– All of the deciples, and Sha'ul, were Hebrews, raised in Jewish tradition, and every book in the new testament was written by Jews. Their native language was Aramaic. That is important given the prophetic nature of the Bible and the embedded Hebrew concepts and teachings and meanings. God did not abandon or set that aside regardless of the translation.
Also, large crowds of peoples gathered on many different occasions to hear Jesus speak from other regions and countries, such as Symaria, when they brought all of their ill and afflicted to Jesus to be healed. Their language was Aramaic and Jesus spoke to them in Aramaic, how else could they understand?
In Jesus' own words, Aramaic phrases are in the Bible (red letter), when he raises the little girl from death, and when he gives up his spirit to God. It is significant that Jesus spoke his last words on earth to the Father in Aramaic and the Greek version reflects that.
In addition to what we see in God's Word, many sources are easily verified by simple research in encyclopedias and historical records.
Anons strive to assertain the truth, though we may arrive at different conclusions. Let us respect that.
There is no need to beat a dead horse, is there?