Anonymous ID: a480e9 Nov. 24, 2018, 5:14 p.m. No.4018165   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8195

>>4018085

So how do you know the people are in control here?

Are you begging the question by assuming the conclusion?

 

What does Q mean by "we are here for a reason", IYO, and WHY can't it just be said?

 

And are you addressing me, or addressing Q, and is the ambiguity in that regard in your response intentional?

What brought you here? Are you originally from /pol/?

Anonymous ID: a480e9 Nov. 24, 2018, 5:15 p.m. No.4018176   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8236

>>4018163

Is this organic?

Repetitive crap that fills /pol/?

Is /pol/ controlled?

And yet the same crap that controls /pol/ is organic here?

Where does the inorganic shilling come from?

Why can't Q just SAY?

Why are we here?

Anonymous ID: a480e9 Nov. 24, 2018, 5:17 p.m. No.4018197   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>I have also, along with others, stated that the group of originals anons are probably gone. These 'originals' we extremely good researchers.

 

Is this believable? Where would these great researchers have gone? Did their great research lead them to conclude there is a better game in town? What is it? Did they quit researching in general? Where would they go?

Anonymous ID: a480e9 Nov. 24, 2018, 5:20 p.m. No.4018226   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8300

>>4018200

Is this organic? Is the system of fakeness so bankrupt for a plan that it literally transfers what is obviously fake on /pol/, here, where it is even ten times less appropriate?

Does the "owner" of the board counteract this in anyway, or emulation sympathy? Why? Why did Q choose [here]? Is there a direct contradiction between the (fake) "chan guy" attitudes enforced here, and reflected in the over-the-top cartoon like character of "BO"– and Q's stated worldview? How do we reconcile? Why are we [here]?

Anonymous ID: a480e9 Nov. 24, 2018, 5:23 p.m. No.4018251   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4018208

I will bake [but I won't be allowed by the AI].

But any HUMANS here– please volunteer. That is how you can FIGHT. Volunteer and DEMAND to bake, HUMANS.

Anonymous ID: a480e9 Nov. 24, 2018, 5:24 p.m. No.4018265   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8278

>>4018237

Why do "anons" continually make essentially pointless posts that push the idea that "the shills are humans"?

Why do anons NEVER EVER suggest that they are bots?

Is that realistic?

The lady protests too much?

Clumsy, idiotic bot system cluelessly self-outing?

Will humans wake up and SPEAK, [here], or continue to graze like sheep while the system of fakeness maintains control?

Anonymous ID: a480e9 Nov. 24, 2018, 5:28 p.m. No.4018292   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4018278

What are you talking about? You didn't even answer the question I asked. Is this normally a problem for you?

Why do you think we are here, with a stream of 98% fake posts? There IS a reason– what is it? Could Q really not set up a board insulated from the fakeness? Then why are we [here]?