>>4018911 (lb)

>>4019005 (lb)

>>4019034 (lb)

Hold on a sec. Hold the fuck on. Tom Arnold being on Team Trump suddenly gives me whiplash in a really interesting way.

Has Tom been infiltrating the cabal, and took Cohen around the "hood" to show him all the shit he needed to know? How many people did Cohen record, in conversation, while hanging with Tom the "absolute crazy coked out 'has-been' actor" that's actually playing the role of a absolute crazy coked out "has-been" actor? And Roseanne? She's "Team Q" on the out and out, but is absolutely fucking crazy, herself (or playing one on TV); which REALLY MAKES SENSE OF THE HANNITY INTERVIEW WEIRDNESS?

Trump is a GOD DAMNED GENIUS. The Apprentice was his way to get in the know with Hollywood types. I wonder who the fuck else is on the team? I mean, Stormy was an easy one because there were multiple angles there. But Tom Arnold? WAAAAAY less subtle. Way more seditious to the cabal if true. Holy SHIT, anons. I knew Trump was high IQ, but this is pressing against Christopher Flangan high IQ.

Which brings to mind something I've been pondering. Do you think Mr. Langan has been tapped for Trump's braintrust?

>>4019161

>>4019147

I just went back and watched that CNN interview with Poppy. What a mind job!

Either:

1. He really is a GREAT actor, and that shit deserves an "Academy" award (doctored himself up to look coked out).

2. Got an apocalyptic message from Cohen about what Trump's doing, and he's spending his time getting gorked out, while worrying about his kids and shiet.

How interesting!

>>4019337

I'm inclined to believe that one of Mr. Langan's strengths is creativity. Have you considered that works such as CTMU are as much creative as they are logical? Think about how you communicate. Now think about how people interpret what you communicate. Math can give us the logical explanation of how we exist in the universe, but only language can explain it in a way that the mind can process it. In order to comprehend the language, you have to interpret the meanings logically. So logic and reason are diametrically opposed when one ceases in their ability to marry one with the other.

>re: Pretending to be smart in previous bread.

I don't have the answers, but I think there are those that are so close to the real truth that all they need is a catalyst, of some sort, to meld their respective understandings into a doctrine of real truth. I'm not what you'd call a "smart man", but that's because the type of logic they use in those tests are beyond what I care to focus. Knowing and admitting that would make me a wiser person in the eyes of the right onlooker, and a fool in the perspective of those we hold to a higher esteem of intellectual pursuit.

Picking up what I'm putting down? Those that can bridge the gap between the logical and the reasonable are rated higher because of their swiftness in ability to do so. They also are the types to exhibit a tendency to revolve in their repetitiveness until a "final solution" appears in the form of discovery of a previously "unknown" understanding of a principal that marries the two.

>>4019502

Chris is Q before Q is Q. It's why I brought him up. The whole idea that NSA, Trump, and a group of rag-tag patriots have been redpilling the redpillers of the chans for years is nothing new. The fact that this fucking guy probably figured it out, all on his own, like a parallel construction, WITH NO HELP AT ALL, is something that should giver everyone pause.

That's why I bring him up. He's the logical and the reasonable in a package that no one can seem to define without a firm grasp on the implausible being the factual.