Q MIXING THE LEVELS FOR US.
BAKER, CAN YOU PLEASE ADD THIS WEBSITE TO THE DOUGH?
IT'S GOT A MULTITUDE OF MAPS/PROOFS OF EVERYTHING WE ARE RESEARCHING. BEEN POSTING MAPS AND PICTURES IN THE LAST TWO BREADS.
https:// throughthelookingglassnews.wordpress.com/
Chewbacca Defense ←SCHIFF is using this
A Chewbacca defense is the name in the United States given to a legal strategy in which the aim of the argument seems to be to deliberately confuse the jury rather than to factually refute the case of the other side. This term was used in an episode of the animated series South Park, “Chef Aid“, which premiered on October 7, 1998. This episode satirized attorney Johnnie Cochran‘s closing argument defending O. J. Simpson in his murder trial. The term has since been commonly used in describing legal cases, especially criminal ones. The concept of disguising a flaw in one’s argument by presenting large amounts of irrelevant information has previously been described as the modern-day equivalent of a red herring or the fallacy ignoratio elenchi (irrelevant conclusion).[1][2]
Within the context of the episode, the fictional Cochran begins his defense case by basing his argument on the Star Wars film series, specifically on the (incorrect) claim that the character Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. He goes on to point out first the supposed senselessness of this decision, noting that “it does not make sense”, and then how his use of Star Wars as evidence in a harassment suit “does not make sense” either, and that therefore the case should be dismissed. His closing argument: “If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit”, lampoons Cochran’s “If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit” phrase used in his defense argument for Simpson.
WHY YOU SAY DAT
ONE MORE LOUDER.
GREAT PHARMACEUTICAL MEMES
GTFO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Everything is useful when you expand your thinking.