Anonymous ID: e3a9e1 Nov. 25, 2018, 10:10 a.m. No.4024660   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4879 >>4896

An Anon posted this in the last bread. Think it's a notable?

 

The Board of Trustees of the WEF is composed of some of the powerful people in the world. Here are some of them.

• Mark Carney, Governor, Bank of England

• Al Gore, Vice-President of the United States (1993-2001); Chairman and Co-Founder, Generation Investment Management LLP

• Jim Yong Kim, President, World Bank

• Christine Lagarde, Managing Director, International Monetary Fund (IMF)

• Peter Maurer, President, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)

• Indra Nooyi, Chairman, PepsiCo

• L. Rafael Reif, President, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

• Ursula von der Leyen, Federal Minister of Defence, Federal Ministry of Defence of Germany

• David M. Rubenstein, Co-Founder and Co-Executive Chairman, Carlyle Group

“Well, to get straight to the science, the principle of non-invasive neuromodulation is to focus ultrasound waves into a region in the brain so that they all gather in a small spot. Then hopefully, given the right set of parameters, this can change the activity of the neurons.”

How dystopian could it get?

I can see the day coming where a scientist will be able to control what a person sees in their mind’s eye, by sending the right waves to the right place in their brain. My guess is that most objections will be similar to those we hear today about subliminal messages in advertisements, only much more vehement.

This technology is not without its risks of misuse. It could be a revolutionary healthcare technology for the sick, or a perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak. This time though, the control would be literal.

 

https://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-world-economic-forum-talks-about-mind-control-using-sound-waves/

Anonymous ID: e3a9e1 Nov. 25, 2018, 10:36 a.m. No.4024897   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4024652

Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists, that it's unclear how much the board's work has mattered in the past, as much of its doings remain classified, and that its near-term future depends on Trump.

 

"The question that hovers around the new board is, does the White House really want its advice?" Aftergood said. "Will the president even listen to its recommendations? Or is board membership an honorary position that is otherwise inconsequential?"

 

Aside from the board, another largely dormant but historically influential intelligence review body is being resurrected with recent Trump nominations to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, an independent agency that issued public reports on mass-surveillance programs revealed by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden.

 

A former Democratic member of the PCLOB, University of California at Berkeley professor James Dempsey, said he's pleased Trump is re-establishing his advisory body, and doesn't believe the board would necessarily go along with unconventional orders.

 

"Looking at their backgrounds, I would assume they will see their mission as supporting the intelligence agencies, not undermining them," Dempsey said.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/trump-names-hand-picked-panel-to-supervise-investigate-intelligence-community