Anonymous ID: 3408a0 Nov. 25, 2018, 7:58 p.m. No.4032168   🗄️.is 🔗kun

What vested auth does the Constitution grant a sitting President re: matters of NAT SEC?

Thank you, Mr. Soros.

Q

 

also thank you to the congress after 9/11/2001 ]ammending[ err [subverting] the

military in operations approved by Congress

needs moar research but this declaration of war dubbed the war on terror

 

article 2 national security search yielded this

https://fas.org/irp/agency/doj/olc092501.html

pic related

 

THE PRESIDENT'S CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT MILITARY OPERATIONS AGAINST TERRORISTS AND NATIONS SUPPORTING THEM

 

� � � �The President has broad constitutional power to take military action in response to the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. Congress has acknowledged this inherent executive power in both the War Powers Resolution and the Joint Resolution passed by Congress on September 14, 2001.

 

� � � � The President has constitutional power not only to retaliate against any person, organization, or State suspected of involvement in terrorist attacks on the United States, but also against foreign States suspected of harboring or supporting such organizations.

 

� � � � The President may deploy military force preemptively against terrorist organizations or the States that harbor or support them, whether or not they can be linked to the specific terrorist incidents of September 11.

 

� � � �September 25, 2001

Anonymous ID: 3408a0 Nov. 25, 2018, 8:52 p.m. No.4032779   🗄️.is 🔗kun

did not expect to see domestic Violence

 

article iv

section 4

 

SECTION 4

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.