Anonymous ID: 64bb93 Nov. 25, 2018, 8:28 p.m. No.4032533   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2564

>>4032451

I'm afraid you're mistaken: I have no tits, and I won't get out.

But I have patience enough and insight to understand that 2 years of presidency might not be enough to "undo" 55 years of malfeasance – and I can appreciate the "plan", while watching carefully ….

I do believe "Tits or GTFO" in this case is not quite instantly applicable as you may be inclined to think.

Anonymous ID: 64bb93 Nov. 25, 2018, 8:40 p.m. No.4032657   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2713 >>2809

>>4032574

WTF do the clockfags know that Anons don't?

For God's sake please – clockfags only trying to make sense out of what's been given, just like all other anons (apart from the faint possibility of shit being hidden in there) in form of timestamps, deltas and whatever not – that doesn't make them know the future ….

"Future unlocks past" ! So we'll all have to wait and enjoy our popcorn in the meantime!

Anonymous ID: 64bb93 Nov. 25, 2018, 8:50 p.m. No.4032763   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4032713

"WE have it all"!

What makes the clockfags any different from the other anons?

Have never seen Q talk to the clockfags only (much less even in their thread) ….

 

So, no, sorry. I love the clockfags, but they're just anons like (maybe not) you and me.

(BTW: Stop namefagging, please!)

Anonymous ID: 64bb93 Nov. 25, 2018, 9 p.m. No.4032861   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2875

>>4032809

If that were so, how do you explain Q's (repeated) references to a clock?

How do you explain "The CLOCK and the GRAPHIC are essential"?

How to explain "markers", and "the clock started - 10 days"?

What to make of the various "coincidences" of posts showing relations in content & timestamps for some topics?

I'm open to anything …. and with Q, I am surely not gonna discard a "more complicated" scheme of coding.

FFS, anons figured out where the "flag" is … why would not for example MIL INT trust us (anons) with a (little bit) more sophisticated scheme of "encoding"?