Why should they. Only the affiants are liable for the falsehoods in the data itself. Anons need to learn how the law works. Start with the definition of an affiant.
I wonder if they're bought and paid for by the Trump DoJ. They got busted pushing a Ponzi scheme(s) but nothing ever happened. Maybe that was what happened: controlled opposition until we tell you otherwise.
Leash? So you didn't take my advice and look up the definition of an affiant. Got it.
Read 'em all. Apparently you haven't.
Disinformation is real.
Disinformation is necessary.
You morons can't seem to figure out what that means.
The rest of the population doesn't understand the law, either. Q is counting on that. Way to autist, anon.
Psyops always have an ulterior motive that isn't always obvious. Sometimes it's just any publicity is good publicity. They're posts are fixed as the first responses to Trump… always. That's not an accident. If we really are watching a movie, then you have to consider the possibility that NOTHING is what we think it is. Literally. ANYBODY could be an actor.
Argh. Their posts, not they're. I won't spelling Nazi others, but I will myself.
Trump just ditched a bunch of never-Trumpers and likely caught half the DNC in the largest vote scam in the history of the country. Then, when the R governors get to appoint their replacements… that's sort of the point of Q's latest post, dontcha think?
GKYS shillanon.
Which would be illegal, and would completely thwart Trump's attempt to take back our Republic and reinstate rule of law. Criminals can't be prosecutors any more than people with conflicts of interest. In fact, being a criminal is a YUGE conflict of interest. A judge would throw out any cases he touched, which means even Trump's eventual exoneration would get scrapped.
Yes and no. He's likely working on a link to HRC. Note that the unclassified authorization letter says "Russian interference in the Trump campaign." Not "Trump working with Russians."
No, he was running ops. Recall that we only get what's published, never any "sources and methods." That's the context we lack to call things "crimes." Everybody just ignores that key point and assume they know the context. They don't. They conveniently forget that prosecutors regularly run all manner of undercover operations, disinformation campaigns, and just about anything else to get criminals. They're even allowed to lie. None of these methods ever get published.
As the director of the FBI for 12 years, he knows a lot, it has nothing to do with with "flipping." He was, however, working for a string of AGs that would bury anything he uncovered if it connected back to the DS.