>>4033654 (lb)
This is one of those few areas I think the lawfag community was in complete agreement. From a practical standpoint, nobody wants /their/ POTUS to be under constant threat of a criminal charge, treason or otherwise. As soon as an opposing party got control, everybody would be in prison. From a legal standpoint, the Constitution.
The whole "expert" thing is a farce. Literally, a science-based discussion that relies on a logical fallacy as "evidence." It's absurd.
The scientists are the actual liars, though Gore does have a special contribution to the movement.
Sue and settle. Trump's DoJ isn't letting them settle any more.
I did call it special for a reason. At least the UK put the smack down on his movie, oddly.
They actually used their own censorship laws against the movie. A sort of truth in publication law (I don't recall details). There were 9 provably false claims in the movie (many more, but these were easy for lay people). They ended up requiring they explain the actual truth for each of those claims if they show the movie. My understanding is that it completely shot it down.
It's what you get when your media is state owned.
Da.