Anonymous ID: d34f5f Nov. 26, 2018, 6:21 a.m. No.4035204   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5208

UK

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2018/10/22/government-bans-phrase-fake-news/

Government bans phrase 'fake news'

23 October 2018 • 12:01am

The government has banned the term “fake news” after urging ministers to use “misinformation” or "disinformation" instead.

The phrase - a favourite of US President Donald Trump - will no longer appear in policy documents or official papers because it is “a poorly-defined and misleading term that conflates a variety of false information, from genuine error through to foreign interference in democratic processes,” officials said.

While ministers may speak freely in the House of Commons, any strategy documents referring to election meddling or internet safety will need to use the new definition.

The ban on the phrase was prompted by an inquiry into "fake news" led by the Digital, Culture, Media and Sports Committee to address the potential for social media to be misused to sway elections. It followed concerns that Russia meddled with the 2016 US presidential election and the UK referendum to leave the EU.

Facebook's technology chief, a former Google designer, Cambridge Analytica employees and Arron Banks, the Leave.EU chief linked to the now defunct data analytics company appeared before MPs to give evidence.

After completing the probe in July, the DCMS Committee released an interim report that warned of a “democratic crisis founded upon the manipulation of personal data which targeted users with pernicious views, particularly during elections and referenda”.

“We recommend that the Government rejects the term ‘fake news’, and instead puts forward an agreed definition of the words ‘misinformation’ and ‘disinformation’. With such a shared definition, and clear guidelines for companies, organisations, and the Government to follow, there will be a shared consistency of meaning across the platforms, which can be used as the basis of regulation and enforcement,” it stated.

Of the 42 recommendations three were accepted and four dismissed, the committee revealed on Tuesday.

The government rejected proposals for a new tax on Facebook and Twitter that could be used to fund education in schools. It vetoed a change in the rules covering political spending online, so that limits are put on the amount of money an individual can donate.

It also refused to disclose how many investigations are being carried out into Russian interference in UK politics.

Committee chair Damian Collins said: “The government’s response to our interim report on disinformation and ‘fake news’ is disappointing and a missed opportunity. It uses other ongoing investigations to further delay desperately needed announcements on the ongoing issues of harmful and misleading content being spread through social media.

“We need to see a more coordinated approach across government to combat campaigns of disinformation being organised by Russian agencies seeking to disrupt and undermine our democracy. The government’s response gives us no real indication of what action is being taken on this important issue.”

Anonymous ID: d34f5f Nov. 26, 2018, 6:22 a.m. No.4035208   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4035204

France

https://www.euronews.com/2018/11/22/france-passes-controversial-fake-news-law

France passes controversial 'fake news' law

last updated: 22/11/2018

France's parliament has passed a new law, which aims to empower judges to order the immediate removal of "fake news" during election campaigns.

Critics argued that the controversial law against the "manipulation of information" could jeopardise democracy and censor the press.

The law, conceived by President Emmanuel Macron, was rejected twice by the senate before being passed by the parliament on Tuesday

It is considered western Europe’s first attempt to officially ban false material.

Macron has said he believes that the internet must be regulated.

“This is the sine quanon condition for a free, open and secure internet, as envisioned by its founding fathers,” he told the annual Internet Governance Forum in Paris last week.

Candidates and political parties will now be able to appeal to a judge to help stop "false information" during the three months before an election.

The law also allows the CSA, the French national broadcasting agency, to render the authority to suspend television channels “controlled by a foreign state or under the influence" of that state if they "deliberately disseminate false information likely to affect the sincerity of the ballot.”

This means France has the power to take on any foreign TV station suspected of spreading “false news.”

The law also states that users must be provided with "information that is fair, clear and transparent" on how their personal data is being used.

Outlets are required to publicly disclose money they have been given to promote certain information.

Those who support the law say the goal is to fight the spread of fake news, not to censor opinions.

Anyone who violates the law could face one year in prison and a fine of €75,000.

The French government has been accused by both right and left wing opponents of trying to create a form of “thought police.”

French politician and former National Front (now known as the National Rally) member Julien Rochedy took to Twitter to criticise the law.

“That's it, the fake news act was passed by parliament. The French state finally has a monopoly on truth and mass diffusion. It can legally censor anything it doesn't like. The return of the 1930s,” he wrote.

The law has also been heavily criticised by Russian media, who say it could jeopordaise democracy and censor the press.

State-run media outlet Russia Today believes the new law “clearly targets foreign media.”

Its editor-in-chief, Margarita Simonyan, called the law a "banal, old-fashioned and boring fight against dissent."

The outlet also claimed that Macron has been harbouring a grudge against Russia Today and Sputnik since the start of his presidential campaign.