>>4035956 last bread n stuff

Regarding Riots in the 60's

Since you were around back then, I figured you would have a different outlook on today's situation.

Back then, there were no keyboard warriors, and no outlet for angst and hate like we have in today's internet.

So instead of bashing hard on a keyboard like today, in the 60's there were riots.

I think you're right, there are a lot of pissed people, but America HAS seen this before. It's not the first time. Luckily, today there is a different outlet besides domestic terrorism, i.e. Weather Underground.

In summary, I think it could be worse today than in the 60's, but because of different outlets, it's not. But America HAS seen this before. It's just taken a slightly different form. Also, we are better prepared, better armed to handle the likes of today's domestic terrorists, Antifa et.al.

>>4036393

Why do you put the word won in quotations? She won her election, but was it legal?

The OP was saying that Sinema will be removed from elected office because of election fraud.

That is where she is going.

>>4036448

Fuck. This isn't a chat room, and trying to discuss this is not worth it. You post sooo much.

>>4036514

I'd rather be digging for new connections to known information.

However, some posters here do not fell the need to find information on their own, instead they ask people for answers.

-Bottoms of shoes that are red. God dammit. That's one of the most popular women's shoes out there. Yet it triggers people.

-Red trees triggers people. Really?

-Angle of shadows are wrong. WTF. Thank God they were not here almost a year ago fucking up that operation involving shadows and figuring out the location of picture.

I hope these, among many others are just putting out misinformation so as to muddy the waters. If not, they need to LURK (research) MOAR and post less.