Anonymous ID: 748948 Nov. 26, 2018, 12:12 p.m. No.4038708   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8729 >>8782 >>8807 >>8915

>>4038668

Pay attention to how elaborate the attempts to sell "ebot" are.

Thousands of posts of bots "interacting with 'ebot'" in ways like this.

Why?

Why the desperate push to get us to accept "ebot" as a part of our community?

[IT] seeks our acceptance.

[IT] wants our freely willed accession to [ITS] willโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 748948 Nov. 26, 2018, 12:18 p.m. No.4038753   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8902 >>8966

>>4038710

This would be my #1 argument on "the climate change issue":

It is a POLITICAL question being framed as a question about science. The POLITICS comes first. If it were purely a question of the environment, then top down pressure would be put on CORPORATIONS to reduce pollution. The scientific questions have their own convolutions, but we should NEVER, in a political context, be misled into thinking that "science dictates certain political necessities". In some future, much more enlightened world that may be possible, but not in this one. It is a POLITICAL move that is enlisting (and thus discrediting) science as a weapon.

Anonymous ID: 748948 Nov. 26, 2018, 12:28 p.m. No.4038868   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4038834

You ruin whatever lame meme you are trying to make when you put gray with black lines over people's faces, stupid bots. You want to USE people's faces in memes, not cover them up.

Why do you keep pushing your pathetic memes on us, bot system?

They suck. They're awful. Try to figure it out.

If the people are waking up to the pervasive AI dominance [here], and on the internet, doesn't it BEHOOVE the AI to not out itself more than it already is with its clumsy, worthless memes?

TRY to think.

Anonymous ID: 748948 Nov. 26, 2018, 12:33 p.m. No.4038915   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>8937 >>8961

>>4038708

>>4038729

>>4038770

>>4038782

>>4038807

Look at the spazzing.

One anon is attacked by many other "anons" that are UPSET at an anon questioning the anti-POTUS spambotโ€ฆ is this organic?

But are the people here passive?

Do they say "hey Q, why are we [here], on a board that tries to force AI on us?"

I believe the people need to ASK.

"We can guide, but you must uncover the truth organically".

Why are we [here]?

"Think for yourself"

What if we are [here] to FORCE the question, FORCE us people to think for ourselvesโ€“ even to the point of saying "Hey Q, why are we here?"

Are passive humans going to wait to be spoonfed, or speak out about what is right in front of their faces?

What is "ebot"?

What is organic here?

Why are we here?

Do anons pay attention?

Because all that anons need to form accurate conclusions flows past, day by day, [here].

Anonymous ID: 748948 Nov. 26, 2018, 12:38 p.m. No.4038976   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>4038937

Stereotyped method of attacking human dissenters?

Stereotyped rhetoric used to silence and discredit?

Pay attention, see who gets attacked, see what gets attacked, see the methods of attack, see who attacks.

I recommend looking at all the posts "anons" make in a given thread in which "controversy" erupts.

If anons pay attention, there is much that can be understood.

We ARE here for a reason.

But passive people, not paying attention, and waiting to be spoonfed happenings will keep us all waiting forever.

We must FIGHT.