Anonymous ID: 3f8176 Nov. 26, 2018, 3:33 p.m. No.4041065   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1085 >>1090 >>1161

>>4040542

img.nope {

filter: grayscale(10%) blur(10px);

overflow: hidden;

max-width: 150px;

max-height: 150px;

}

 

#Decrease RED TEXT size and recolour to Hot Pink for lulz

span.heading {

color: #ff00f0; #Hot Pink

font-size: 4pt; #Real small, default is 11pt

}

 

I like the concept and tried it in my custom CSS (pasted above, so you can see where I pasted it) but am not seeing the effect.

Anonymous ID: 3f8176 Nov. 26, 2018, 3:38 p.m. No.4041120   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1151

>>4041104

Not lying. Fork of the code, hosted on different website, not using the so-called "deep dreaming" path that added the dogs and eyeballs and beaks, just using neural network that analyzes a picture and adds elements from one picture into another.

 

>>4041090

Changed the comment to this and now it works!

/ Decrease RED TEXT size and recolour to Hot Pink for lulz. /

ThankQ anon - funs.

Anonymous ID: 3f8176 Nov. 26, 2018, 3:51 p.m. No.4041273   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4041161

I'm using a NOPE filter which needs its own CSS paragraph, rather than your image blur.

 

Feedback: I liked this color #FF3366

and I'm not seeing any font size change, hmmmmmmm. Not sure why, not interested in doing a heavy debugging session to calculate the effect of chan's javascript plus custom. I'm happy.

Just curious why font size does not change for me.

Anonymous ID: 3f8176 Nov. 26, 2018, 3:56 p.m. No.4041328   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>4041178

Good points.

 

It had already started around 11/18. The bottom post ( >>3950502 PB ) is mine; a wise baker replied and we were in agreement about the possible inclusion of informed opinion when appropriate, at baker's discretion.