Anonymous ID: 471abc Nov. 26, 2018, 5 p.m. No.4042143   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2186 >>2217 >>2245 >>2259 >>2404 >>2737

>>4042094 (lb)

yes.

 

I've never been a baker, nor do I desire to, but I've been around since the beginning as well.

 

Eventually, you just learn to repost what you feel is 'notable' a few hours later, or maybe even a day or two later.

 

what irks me is how frequently I'll post something a couple times, it gets no traction, and then I'll see what 'I' typed up being reposted a few days later, hitting notables and absolutely no recognition that the faggot that copypasta'd it got it from another anon.

 

Happens a lot, but whatever, more concerned really about just sharing the info than getting credited.

 

Of late, however, I've seen a disturbing trend of old notables being necro'd back up, sliding the research and breads all over again - and rarely are the necro'd notables legit. They'd been debunked pretty thoroughly previously, sometimes multiples of times.

Anonymous ID: 471abc Nov. 26, 2018, 5:14 p.m. No.4042327   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2478 >>2531

>>4042259

agreed. That's why I did try to be fairly neutral and white-bread with the statements I made.

 

I 'have' noticed an uptick recently in notables being dredged back up however. I'm bringing it up now specifically to raise awareness and get others looking out if they're not already. It's quite possible I'm being hyper sensitive - and it's equally possible independent research brings up old news as well.